• 10

[討論] Canon G1X對4/3片幅的影響


g327238 wrote:
出來騙錢的吧!感光元...(恕刪)

鏡頭的設計被光學的物理特性限制住。再怎麼用心,也不可能打破物理的定律。大光圈的變焦鏡在這個片幅會大到你不想帶出門,要不然就會出現成像圈。

以後一定會有這樣的鏡頭出來,只是不會用玻璃做的。
My photography blog: http://sunnyeasy.wordpress.com/ My doggie blog: http://i

vs3151user wrote:
我突然覺得Canon...(恕刪)
4/3 好像沒有專利問題不是嗎? 任何公司都可以用

MUS wrote:
弟認為Canon家的...(恕刪)


剛好相反, Canon 的董事在上週的訪談裡面已經明言 Canon 的 EVIL 機會在 2012 年中推出了

http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/news/interview/20120106_502756.html

訪談中一直強調大小與畫質之間的平衡點, G1X 的 CMOS 很有可能就是 EVIL 機會使用的大小
你根本不會算真正的景深光圈

不懂就別來亂胡說...

g327238 wrote:
出來騙錢的吧!感光元...(恕刪)

g327238 wrote:
出來騙錢的吧!感光元...(恕刪)


It is true! Please translate this statement of dpreview into Chinese:

"Sensor size and aperture: relationship to low light image quality and background blur

The G1 X has a much larger sensor than other fixed-lens compacts, which implies it should offer much better high ISO image quality. But for fixed-lens cameras, that's only half of the story, and lens speed plays a crucial role when considering low light performance. Smaller-sensor cameras such as the Olympus XZ-1 and Fujifilm X10 sport lenses which are rather faster than the G1 X's, by a stop or more at wideangle and two stops at telephoto. This means that, under any given lighting, you can always use lower ISOs with these cameras. This will go some way to offsetting the G1 X's larger-sensor advantage - especially at telephoto.

Much the same reasoning applies when considering how well each camera will be available to deliver blurred backgrounds when shooting portraits. Here the optical calculations deliver an answer that some may find surprising: when shooting portraits at the long end of the zoom with the lens wide open, the G1 X will offer little advantage over either the X10 or XZ-1 in terms of subject isolation and background blur. Of course this isn't anywhere near the whole story with regard to overall image quality, but it's worth knowing."

G1X is not better than XZ1 or X10 in low light but double of their price!

Canon 搞正名了喔
叫MILC 不是EVIL

而且DPreview 去年有做一個網路投票
MILC 這個縮寫得票率最高
http://www.dpreview.com/polls/

Nikon 日本官網的1系列介紹
Nikon 創造了一個名詞 ACIL
也不叫EVIL

EEGA wrote:
剛好相反, Cano...(恕刪)


This will scare me more than the G1X!

Olympus and Panasonic need to hurry up for the consolidation of the EVIL market.

toto0833 wrote:
Canon 搞正名了...(恕刪)


Yes, you are right but EVIL is not in the list.

EVIL may still be the No. 1!

How about let's vote these two here mobile01 with another new thread?

年終領十萬的買Fujifilm X-PRO 1
年終領五萬的買Canon PowerShot G1X
其實樂觀點看 搞不好canon提供感光元件給O家:P
反正都是4:3
這樣O家也可以作Multi aspect:P
(O家真是左右逢源XD)

不過個人覺得 FUJI家那招 改變濾色片排列 取消LPF O家也會跟著用
  • 10
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 10)
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?