• 2

Nikon Df 樣圖

發現大家都在忙於比較各個機身差異,似乎沒有人放,
網路上看到一些樣圖,給大家參考~

官方樣圖

Df vs D800
2013-11-09 13:24 發佈
文章關鍵字 Nikon DF

Yu 俞 wrote:
發現大家都在忙於比較...(恕刪)


這些圖前兩天早就看到了,問題看到那些酸文,我連貼都懶得貼上來

不過還是感謝您的分享


D3/D200X2/D50/D40/FM3A/F100/FM2/CP7900/ U40/U20/L1X2
有使用58mm/f1.4G這鏡頭的照片


Nikon Df with AF-S NIKKOR 58mm f/1.4G, 1/3200s, f/1.4, 58mm, ISO 100.

好糊啊~XD
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/iam_moson
Yu 俞 wrote:
發現大家都在忙於比較...(恕刪)

Nikon Df(D4) vs D800 Low ISO Performance:
Also, the below are 100% crops, without any down-sampling applied. If the Nikon D800 images are down-sampled to 16 MP resolution, the files will look much cleaner.

1. ISO100: As expected, both cameras handle base ISO extremely well.
2. ISO200: The same is with ISO 200.
3. ISO400: At ISO 400 the Nikon D800 has a tad more noise in some parts of the image. However, keep in mind that you are looking at pixel-level performance. As I have mentioned above, down-sampling to equal size will diminish these differences.
4. ISO800: At ISO 800, the Nikon D800 shows more noise, especially in the shadows.
5. ISO1600: At ISO 1600, the differences in pixel level noise are pretty clear – the Nikon Df is cleaner in comparison.
6. ISO3200: The same thing can be observed at ISO 3200. The grain definitely appears larger on the D800.
7. ISO6400: At ISO 6400, the Nikon D800 is already losing some shadow details and adding artifacts throughout the image.
8. ISO12800: And at ISO 12800, the D4 still retains plenty of shadow information, while the D800 lost a lot of it. More noise and artifacts appear at pixel level on the D800. Most importantly, there is a noticeable loss of color on the D800.
9. ISO25600: ISO 25600 looks like garbage on the D800 – something I would not want to use at all. And yet the Df still manages to retain colors and details better even at such high ISO values.
10. ISO51200-204800: While ISO 204,800 is extremely noisy and unacceptable for most people, ISO 51,200 and 102,400 could be somewhat usable when down-sampled.

Now keep in mind once again that we are purely looking at pixel level performance here. Once 36 MP images from the D800 are resized to 16 MP, the performance differences shrink quite a bit. Once “normalized” there is not much of a difference from ISO 100 to ISO 6400. Only at ISO 12800 and above the Nikon Df seems to offer an advantage when down-sampled. And obviously it can go even beyond that all the way to ISO 204,800, while the D800 stops at ISO 25600.

iamMoson wrote:
Nikon Df with AF-S NIKKOR 58mm f/1.4G, 1/3200s, f/1.4, 58mm, ISO 100.

好糊啊~XD


很糊但頗有復古味
所以是為了這復古味
才只用1600萬畫素的感光元件嗎XD
剛剛看了一下規格表
落差不是那麼大(當然D800略勝一籌啊)

我猜這兩台的PK
應該會落在外型吧 呵呵

加油 希望早日看到開箱文啊
說實在的看過Sony A7R的Sample照在回頭看Nikon DF真的不怎麼樣,不過捫心自問這麼銳利的影像我真的用的到嘛?我又不出大圖,一千六百萬畫素已經夠我用了(D7000的原檔大小已經讓我吃不消了)況且DF還有一個超級利器:ISO204,800,堪稱旅遊的超級好夥伴~實在沒有理由就A7R或A7,沒錄影?其實也還好,以前FM2+DV雙機流不也走過不少地方嘛...其實我更懷疑婚攝要那麼利的相機幹嘛?每個婚紗都被修很夢幻,要是比照原圖的話,應該很多新娘會翻臉吧!
I support the domestic film industry,but who would support me?(Google翻的)
我前幾天幫我姊跟我小孩拍合照,放FB,被她傳訊抱怨,明明是還原度很高的一張,很有當時現場的感覺,她說她有年紀了不能拍這種,我說妳都44了,不用在意這個吧。

瞬間發現為什麼賣最好的總是Canon了

Andy84 wrote:
說實在的看過Sony...(恕刪)
所以Nikon端出1600萬畫素加上D600同級的對焦系統是為了避免太準焦,解銳度過高
,因為太清晰的照片難看沒有味道?又ISO 204800到底是什麼場合用我超級好奇

另外DF據說沒有低通,不知會有摩爾紋問題嗎?

Andy84 wrote:
說實在的看過Sony...(恕刪)


第一次看到有人對銳利的畫質有排拆的,想必這位人兄對鏡頭的要求也不高,反正太銳利你也用不到。

而且為什麼高ISO會是旅遊的超級好夥伴??旅遊還是用輕巧方便為主吧!!!

如要用雙機,乾脆買有錄影功能的全幅機種不是更好,為什麼硬要買DF再帶台DV??這樣有比較方便??

沒有人會原圖給新娘呀,出的圖都要後製所以你底才要打好,沒有銳利的原圖,是每張都要出氣氛的嗎??

雖然說青菜蘿蔔各有喜好,但護航護成這樣,也太有意思了吧!!
  • 2
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?