自己手上也有一管Zeiss 85mm,
每次整理照片時,Zeiss的發色總是會讓我眼睛為之一亮,
可是就35mm F1.4這個規格來說,在Y站商城Zeiss竟然還比原廠還貴,
但如果比一下MTF曲線圖又覺得在F1.4情形下Nikon 1.4G比較利,
雖然蔡司有很多優點,小弟用過之後也曾想過以後所有定焦鏡都要買Zeiss,
可是就35mm F1.4這款來說,這樣的定價是不是還有其他可以和1.4G相抗衡的優勢?
說來說去,對這個價位有點不解,雖然我也是蔡司愛用者...
可否請各位大大分享一下看法呢?
不過倒是有人針對這二顆鏡頭 Zeiss 35mm f1.4 Distagon vs. Nikon AF-S 35mm f1.4G 做了一些比較，不訪看看下列網址。
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1030&message=38963449
------ Quote ------
And now conclusion;
Nikon is a little bit sharper and well corrected but this doesnt mean zeiss is not.I am talking about pixel peeping.Zeiss has the creamiest bokeh i have ever seen on a wide angle lens.Construction award goes to zeiss as well but nikon is shorter and has less weight which is a good thing for street shooting.
So which is best.I dont know.It is a personel taste.
If you like a lens built like a tank,great pop and have a tremendous bokeh gp with zeiss but dont forget to have exact focus at 1.4 to 2.8 is a real hit or miss
If you like a well built lens which is not heavy and has great sharpness and great bokeh with the ease of AF than go with Nikon.What about the micro contrast which zeiss have?PP will bring it out couse the difference is not huge like other Zeiss lenses to Nikon lenses.I thing this time Nikon has done its homework.
Thanks
Ahmed Gencal
------ Unquote ------
幫Horology大大代答：
分享在這裡：
煎熬許久的「升級」─ Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 1.4/35 ZF.2
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X