http://nikonrumors.com/2011/03/28/auto-focus-accuracy-a-scientific-cross-brand-analysis-guest-post.aspx
Nikon的表現很優，想不到第二名是S家不是C家，這有點超出個人的觀念~~
擷錄原文
Nikon gets the best results with 70% of tests with a low auto-focus error (between 0 and 5% of error) and only 10% of tests with high auto-focus error (more than 10% of error) , followed by Sony and Canon, Pentax and Olympus with worst results (45% of good results – 0-5% error – and 25% of high levels of error – > 10% -) .
monster8564 wrote:
http://nikonrumors.com/2011/03/28/auto-focus-accuracy-a-scientific-cross-brand-analysis-guest-post.aspx
Nikon的表現很優，想不到第二名是S家不是C家，這有點超出個人的觀念~~
擷錄原文
Nikon gets the best results with 70% of tests with a low auto-focus error (between 0 and 5% of error) and only 10% of tests with high auto-focus error (more than 10% of error) , followed by Sony and Canon, Pentax and Olympus with worst results (45% of good results – 0-5% error – and 25% of high levels of error – > 10% -) .
這是您引的「結論」的完整文章：
Based on this figure the conclusion is : Nikon gets the best results with 70% of tests with a low auto-focus error (between 0 and 5% of error) and only 10% of tests with high auto-focus error (more than 10% of error) , followed by Sony and Canon, Pentax and Olympus with worst results (45% of good results – 0-5% error – and 25% of high levels of error – > 10% -) . However this figure is terribly misleading, because other variables can influence these tests: the model of the body, the lens manufacturers, lenses model, and aperture…
換句話說，您引的那一段並不是完整的段落。
事實上，建議您把全部的文章看完，該文的統計分析結果很有意思。
Lionel Humbert 的論點有沒有說服力是其次，至少 Lionel 提出了一個挺有意思的分析方法。
You don't take a photograph, you make it. - Ansel Adams
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X