壓力鍋 wrote:
看了照片嚇了一跳，M...(恕刪)
那照片不知道是怎麼裁出來的，MP50的最邊角確實畫質會下降
但R50在15mm處明顯的像場彎曲裁邊角是看不到的
F1.4的照片看來跟Zeiss OTUS 55/1.4差太多了，根本不能比。
What were the basic design concepts behind the development of the AF-S NIKKOR 58mm f/1.4G?
Sato: "There were two important elements. The first was to develop the basic design concept of the Noct Nikkor, achieving superior reproduction of point light sources as point images without distortion or fringes while retaining higher resolution than that of the Noct Nikkor.
To be exact, sharpness, contrast and resolution have been greatly enhanced even for shooting distant scenes. Especially, the lens' sharpness is overwhelmingly superior to that of the Noct Nikkor. Besides this, because sagittal coma flare is effectively reduced, the degree of point-light-source reproduction in the form of points has been further evolved to extend the range to the outer areas of the frame. Also, subjects located even at the peripheries can be depicted without edge distortion. Branches of a tree or parts of a car, for example, can be reproduced in a way that Noct Nikkor could not do as well. All of these factors make your shooting more comfortable. And unlike Noct Nikkor, you can attain these without stopping down the aperture to f/2.8, f/4 or f/5.6 but at the maximum f/1.4.
不是放錯範例照就是睜眼說瞎話(雖然這在鏡頭宣傳文裡並不罕見...)
如果真是這種水準應該會比50ZA被罵得更慘吧
我的相簿 http://www.flickr.com/photos/calatravayang
Horology wrote:
Sato: "There were two important elements. The first was to develop the basic design concept of the Noct Nikkor, achieving superior reproduction of point light sources as point images without distortion or fringes while retaining higher resolution than that of the Noct Nikkor.
To be exact, sharpness, contrast and resolution have been greatly enhanced even for shooting distant scenes. Especially, the lens' sharpness is overwhelmingly superior to that of the Noct Nikkor. Besides this, because sagittal coma flare is effectively reduced, the degree of point-light-source reproduction in the form of points has been further evolved to extend the range to the outer areas of the frame. Also, subjects located even at the peripheries can be depicted without edge distortion. Branches of a tree or parts of a car, for example, can be reproduced in a way that Noct Nikkor could not do as well. All of these factors make your shooting more comfortable. And unlike Noct Nikkor, you can attain these without stopping down the aperture to f/2.8, f/4 or f/5.6 but at the maximum f/1.4.
不是放錯範例照就是睜眼說瞎話
扯!
搞不好，同時錯兩個!
不過，說正經地。還是要同場景、同機身來比較才公正!我想!
平安、健康最重要
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X