• 5

D700整體規格有勝於D3嗎???~陷入兩難中..

如果只差在速度....那哪個笨蛋會買D3+1風景和人像,建議用24-70+85F1.4
小弟建議如果小朋友夠就直接上D3畢竟D3還有很多強過D700,D3只是少除塵這項而已
我覺得可以在等等,等很多資訊出來,了解之後再決定才不會後悔!
專業機比準專業機強的地方,有些是規格表上看不到的.

Nikon從底片機時代,如F4S VS F90X, F5 VS F100,以至於目前的D3 VS D700,
從規格來看,實在相差彷彿,甚至F90X AF元件CAM 246的規格,還優於F4S CAM 200.

但是長期使用下來,用戶就能了解,光是用料與穩定性,兩者的差別.

國外用戶的使用報告中,F90X有高山症,F100 經常莫名奇妙會跑出ERR訊息,而捲片桿易斷(雖然之後有改良),
而以上這些問題,在比業餘機還先發表的 F4/F5/F6專業機上,幾乎都看不到(暫且先撇開體積或重量這些因素).

D700 未來會怎麼樣?誰也不知道,用料就跟D3的確是有差距,這是已知的,值不值得,端看買方需求.
很多人不是沒有摳摳買 D3

只是 他們更想要一台 沒手把 有內閃的全幅機~~

去掉手把 + 外閃 .... 出外拍照... 一整個輕鬆很多....
除非是完全不想添購垂直把手
如果日後會買把手的話
那還不如D3比較划算
學習永無止境
頂級機的發表,對於相機廠商來說,是技術與實力的展現,是拿來跟對手嗆聲的工具,獲利多寡
與銷售數量,並非主要考量.

至於公司要獲利,則有賴於業餘機身來撐盤. 如D40,D50,D60,D70,D80 這類熱銷的機種,
才是幫Nikon賺大錢的機身.

而未來D700的總銷量,相信應該會高於D3, 次級機銷量大於頂級機,這才符合廠商的規劃.

以下節錄自知名攝影師ken Rockwell 網頁的評論,參考參考!

連結: http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d700.htm
------------------------------------------------------------


What the D700 does better than the D3

$2,000 less expensive.

Smaller and lighter, unless you opt for the grip.

Sensor cleaner.

------------------------------------------------------------

What the D3 still does better than the D700

Faster! Not only is the frame rate much faster, the D3 is way faster than the D300 because it has bigger motors, bigger AF-S drivers and more processing horsepower to do all the math required of the AF system. I suspect the D3 will similarly be faster than the D700.

5:4 crop mode (not in D700). I use this daily!

D3 has onboard live backup with a second card slot, which I use all the time. D700, as an amateur camera, only has one slot.

No sensor cleaner working every time you turn it on means the D3 probably fires up faster than the D700.

Bigger battery, unless you add the grip to the D700.

D3 has a rear data LCD, which I've not found that useful. D700 has none.

Shutter "tested" to 300,000 cycles, vs. 150,000.

Better finder for DX; the D3 crops well instead of just drawing a rectangle.

D3 may have far superior finder if the D700 has the same silly obstructive-black active AF area indicators. (The D3 has unconstructively lit active AF areas.)

The D700 has no card-door release lever, since the new INFO button is there. I suspect the D700 card door will feel worthless and weak, like the doors on my Canon DSLRs.

The D700 is an amateur camera. By default, the D700 has the idiot beeper (CFN d1) ON, while the professional D3 has it OFF.

The D3 is tougher.

The D3 has a super easy-to-use note-taking function: just press the mic button

各有各的好~樓主!就差個幾萬~你就上D3吧~因為內容不是差很多~
要我就上專業機了~~~
D3跟D700我都用過了,以下是我的心得

1.基本上除了O家超音波除塵外,其他家效果都只是普普
除的掉的自己用吹球也吹的掉,除不掉的機身除塵一樣沒辦法
還不如用NX2或PS CS3自己點

2.24-70囉

3.超廣角變形一定會有
14-24的變形量已經很輕微了
至於大景要看是多大的景
14端的視角接近120度左右
24端也很夠用了

4.有

5.不需要長板
小黑五腳架鎖點剛好是重心位置
至於接環部分強度那更不需要擔心
除非你每次鎖上三腳架的位置都是機身

D3的優勢就是耐候性與機身可靠度
但也把D3期望太高
我同事以前帶D2xs到新疆
號稱防塵防滴結果到了沙漠連風沙都檔不住
LCD內居然有沙子在裡面.....注意,是LCD不是CCD

D700的優勢就是方便與彈性
想要輕便就單機身
想要持久跟速度就加把手
還可以無線遙控SB800/SB900
D3呢?抱歉...請買SU800
而且在惡劣的環境...搞不好你會比你的D700提早掛掉
低調再低調~
  • 5
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?