lovepeeper wrote:
大家好 想換鏡頭 目...(恕刪)
1870 用料實在C/P高
18105 焦段較靈活
1855 C/P 最高也最輕便
以上三者任一都適合
55200會犧牲太多大景⋯最不好的選擇！
對我而言⋯
lovepeeper wrote:
大家好 想換鏡頭 目...(恕刪)
怕重...懶得換鏡頭...
玩單眼幹嘛= =?
買台類單或DC不就解決了...
18-300買了以後還想補18-105?16-85?
如果只是為了輕
那你買18-300幹嘛?
我實在不明白為什麼要做這一連串多此一舉的舉動-..-
Monte920 wrote:
我最近就是把18-200VR II給賣了,換了18-300VR回來. 以重量和長度來說的確是增加了, 但是並不會到難以忍受的程度,初試帶出去拍了一天, 感覺還好,尚不會脖子酸. (我是配上S5 Pro拍)
但18-300VR畫質則明顯比18-200VR II佳,銳利度好很多,300mm端並沒有想像中的軟(當然不能跟300mm f2.8或f4.0這種鏡頭來比),甚至焦段縮水的情況也比18-200VR在200mm端的縮水情況輕微很多,單單這幾點,18-300mmVR就值回票價了! (DPreview最近的測試也證實了18-300VR比18-200VR的解析度好上一截).
樓主提到的那四顆鏡頭我以前也都用過,我覺得都無法取代18-300VR. 唯一可以考慮的是你沒有提到的16-85mmVR這支,這支同樣解析度佳,又有16mm廣角,鏡身重量輕,只是最長僅到85mm端. 如果真有望遠的需求,那就要加一支望遠鏡頭.
1. 畫質比較：
http://kenrockwell.com/nikon/comparisons/DX-super-zooms/index.htm
2. DPreview 評語
http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/nikon-af-s-18-300mm-3p5-5p6-vr/5
Optically the 18-300mm is fairly typical for its type, which is to say plenty of compromises come with its huge range. Sharpness is something of a mixed bag - as usual for a superzoom it's best towards the wide end, but the corners of the frame tend to look a bit soft at all settings. The lens isn't very sharp at all wide open at telephoto; but, to be fair, it holds up better into the mid-telephoto range (~100mm) than other superzooms. Vignetting is very visible wide open at 18mm, and distortion pronounced at all focal lengths - barrel at wideangle, and pincushion across the rest of the range.
Our biggest concern about the 18-300mm, though, is its performance at the telephoto end. In practical use, chances are you'll be shooting at maximum aperture much of the time, and relying on the lens's VR system to keep things steady. But image quality at telephoto isn't great especially wide open, and this is compounded by a VR system that we've found to fail consistently across a specific shutter speed range (approx 1/125 - 1/40 sec). The D3200 we used for testing also frequently misfocused slightly when shooting at telephoto. This means that we often found real-world results at to be disappointing in the telephoto range - and especially at 300mm.
不管是畫質還是文字評論，18-300 很明顯都大輸 18-200。最基本的邏輯：定焦鏡的畫質最利，x3, x4, x11.1, x16.6 畫質只會不斷下降， 唯一能突破光學限制的只有人類的想像力。
我最近才賣掉 18-200 想換 18-300，現在想買 Sigma 17-70 加 Nikon 70-300 VR。
內文搜尋