• 5

X-A1 有 review 了

"The camera delivers impressive performance, and smoother results than the X-Trans CMOS sensor used in the X-M1, with excellent levels of detail."

測試人員也覺得ISO表現比X-M1好. 但是看sample picture中, 似乎在X-A1有對比加強以及銳化的情形, 從ISO 100起字體邊緣和色格都有黑邊的光環效應.

^^A 請多多指教~
該網站給予X-A1, 16-50mm kit lens, 及X series評價都很好啊! X-A1以USD600的價位提供這樣的性能對他牌無反光鏡與類單眼機種是非常有競爭力的, 鏡頭群完整, 照片又出色!
The 16-50mm OIS kit lens, despite being a kit lens, delivers excellent image quality with a useful wide-angle to telephoto zoom range and includes a good sized lens hood. The combination of this lens and the compact body makes for a compelling package, with the added bonus of a good 3inch tilting screen and built in Wi-Fi connectivity. For those that want a more traditional feeling camera, as well as a built in viewfinder, you would be best looking at the X-E1, however for the price, the X-A1 delivers excellent results with good controls and layout.

The X-A1 is the most affordable Fujifilm X series CSC available yet, and despite using a "standard" APS-C CMOS sensor, delivers impressive image quality, with low noise right up to ISO3200 and ISO6400 while retaining good levels of detail. Some may even find the results from this camera preferable to the results from the more expensive X-M1. With the introduction of the X-A1, Fujifilm also introduced a number of more affordable lenses, making the Fujifilm X series a much more compelling system. With impressive image quality and a camera packed with features, we would highly recommend the Fujifilm X-A1.
Fuji X-A1 - Full review & samples & 100% crops
剛剛比對了 photographyblog 兩張圖:

1.X-A1, 1/18 sec f/8 ISO 800:
http://img.photographyblog.com/reviews/fujifilm_x_a1/photos/fujifilm_x_a1_11.jpg

2.X-M1, 1/60 sec f/8 ISO 800:
http://img.photographyblog.com/reviews/fujifilm_x_m1/photos/fujifilm_x_m1_11.jpg

(兩張設定主要差異為曝光時間, X-A1 曝光時間較長, 所以比較亮)

不過重點還是在細節表現能力. 雖然 X-A1 幾乎沒有雜訊, 不過細節抹掉不少, 整體有種油畫感; X-M1 相比之下細節保留較完整, 不過伴隨些許的雜訊.

X-A1 官網的測試樣本中, 小孩的膚質跟衣服的紋路似乎也有過抹現象, 不知有沒有人也注意到?



Fujifilm X-A1 Review

Ratings (out of 5)
Design 4.5
Features 4.5
Ease-of-use 4
Image quality 5
Value for money 5

Fujifilm X-M1 Review

Ratings (out of 5)
Design 4.5
Features 4
Ease-of-use 4
Image quality 5
Value for money 4.5

airboy0914 wrote:
http://www...(恕刪)


看了一下3200幾乎沒甚麼雜訊,

抹滿兇的

顏色很討喜!!!

本來有點想買X-M1,現在要再考慮考慮
其實自己心裡頭要先有一個概念: review 歸review, 而好的靜態照片品質並不見得代表好操作或者是順利就能拍攝到照片.

覺得review 很棒因此寧願等開賣等了半天, 買完才知道對焦比預期更慢 (安慰自己慢慢拍?)或是自己喜歡的場景卻老是測光不甚精準的情形也是屢見不鮮. 所以或許大家看review 的同時, 把reviewer 的話做為參考, 也要記得看看sample gallery以及實際操作流暢度/ 切換參數的youtube影片等等.
^^A 請多多指教~
其實我覺得,如果預算是落在xa1這個級距的,自然會覺得這台的畫質是夠用的
顏色我覺得xa1確實有種x100的感覺,好像更fresh的感覺…
但過抹的問題也是存在
不過這就是感光片不同之處
以這個價位,這個片幅,我覺得算是c/p值很高的一台相機
若是不考慮後制的人,這系列應該會是很好的選擇

我感覺是一分錢一分貨,倒不覺得是富士打自家的臉
就我的感覺,我覺得x-pro1機身質感和ovf就滿值那個錢,顏色和xe1也不盡相同
而xe1高感度的畫質又比xm1好,
而xa1看起來,高感光就是那種抹得很光滑的樣子,似乎比xm1又更嚴重些
但如果經常是縮圖使用,其實沒什麼差別
不過我還是喜歡那種單色高感度雜訊的呈現方式,有些雜訊卻保留細節的樣子…
(希望xe1s可以保留xe1原有的高感光度水準,抹得光滑在評測上很吃香,在實拍上…我只能說拍出來連媽媽都不認得了…)





ZephyrWu wrote:
Fujifilm X...(恕刪)

兩台相機在Features的評分為何會不同? 令人不解
  • 5
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?