• 10

大兔三 1DS-MARK III 全台最高海拔測試

ctxkevin wrote:
對焦是對人,你怎麼讓背後的葉子清楚...(恕刪)


我當然知道對焦是在人上面
指不夠利的地方當然也是指對焦點上的部份
這應該不用特別提吧
有人會去注意散景夠不夠犀利清晰嗎?

另外我主要疑問的重點是擺在
這樣高的像素是否已經超越鏡頭的解析度了
並不是在照片是否清晰
Thanksgiving wrote:
這樣高的像素是否已經超越鏡頭的解析度了(恕刪)


很無奈的,確實可以這麼說

對某些鏡頭來說, 1DS-3 是照妖鏡
Thanksgiving wrote:
我當然知道對焦是在人...(恕刪)


若您是拿另一張開F1.6來比,的確,F1.2那張臉部是沒這麼利
不過用鏡頭最大光圈照,就算是50mm F1.2L這隻鏡F1.2還是會比縮到F1.6用100%圖仔細看來的糊
應該是正常吧

個人覺得85mm F1.2L銳利度是比50mm這隻好

就如樓主說的,85mm F1.2跟50mm F1.2這兩隻鏡頭在1Ds M3同開F1.2應該是可以看出來
我想一般的機子就不大容易了。

您指的是這個意思吧?
ctxkevin wrote:
若您是拿另一張開F1...(恕刪)


是的,個人經驗,50/1.2 的銳利度『遠不及』85/1.2 以及 135/2

^_^
感謝樓主提供這麼棒的資訊分享....真是好機器,讓人口水直流....

請問是否有廣角鏡的原片幅可以分享??手札那裏的測試圖讓我有點小失望~~~
哈哈~~~ 炫耀文~~~ 哈哈

假如 N 家的 D3, 可以接蔡司的 135 ZA F1.8, 你就知道有啥差別了~~
強勁的對手~~~ 我覺得將會是$ONY!!
大河馬 wrote:
對丫沒有對錯的可惜我...2200萬大三對我而言
會把我目前的電腦及週邊全都要昇級
(恕刪)


聽到河馬兄這麼一說,
我突然也覺得我的電腦該升級,
每次raw批次轉jpg檔時,
就感覺到四年前買的P4 2.6G HT (478腳位) + 1G DDR400 RAM的電腦真不夠力,
不過目前小孩會吃錢,每個月薪水又要交國庫,
大概我跟這些機子都是中間隔著絕緣體,
連電腦升級大概也要半夜偷爬起來拿鎯頭敲壞它才有可能換吧.....

開始壞念單身的那段幸福了,抱歉~離題了
davyhsieh wrote:


哇哩咧

D3才...(恕刪)


這篇參考一下, 這應該是D3 高ISO時 畫面純淨的原因.
http://www.astrosurf.com/buil/nikon_test/test.htm

其中結論如下
Conclusion
The readout noise of the Nikon and Canon CMOS detectors is very similar. The high ISO sensitivity displayed by Nikon is for the marketing: Nikon D3 CMOS (and also the CMOS D300 CMOS - Sony origin) is a very high quality sensor, but in the end, Nikon just rises now the level of Canon technology.

The behaviour of Nikon DSLR are radically different from the Canon ones for long exposure:

- For Nikon, the hot pixels are eliminated by a sophisticated digital processing external to the sensor. During this digital processing, the signal of the neighboring pixels is also affected. The damage of such processing is well-known in astronomy: the weak stars are also eliminated and the image loose photometric qualities on stellar like objects.
- For Canon, the thermal signal is reduced for each pixel by a differential reading method. The thermal signal level measured at the output of the sensor is very low. The residual can efficiently be removed during the image processing (a simple substraction of a reference dark signal map).

It is tragic to see that Nikon solved the problem of thermal signal by a digital processing of the RAW files (i.e. NEF files do not contain true raw data). This processing can surely meet the daytime users and the high performance for main application is evident. But by repeating the same mistake made on the D70 and the D200 (equipped with a CCD) on the news Digital SLR Nikon probably divorces once more with the astronomical community.

Today the Canon and Pentax cameras seem to be the only ones useable digital SLR for efficient and advanced astronomy.


這篇文章 就是CANON CMOS技術白皮書
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-Full-Frame-CMOS-White-Paper.pdf

其中Page 17-19 有提及 CANON的On-Chip降躁技術 即是前面文章中所提及的 "differential reading method"
有興趣的可以讀一下~~
"照妖鏡" 形容的還真是貼切呀 ~
感謝 Julius 兄的解惑

看來除了照妖之外
也能突顯出少數幾支定焦L的可怕實力

>個人經驗,50/1.2 的銳利度『遠不及』85/1.2 以及 135/2

看到這段還真期待有機會可以看到 85/1.2 & 135/2 的真正實力呀
ctxkevin wrote:
聽到河馬兄這麼一說,...(恕刪)


哈哈

知道痛了把
不是用了大畫系就不用昇級自己的電腦哦
ET COMET Elnchrom 棚燈及LEAF機背有問題皆可問我
  • 10
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 10)
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?