如果您有爬過在咱們N家裡的T70-300 您就會知道 這枝 是不是真的銳利
口說無憑 直接給您看看小弟拍的結果，不敢多多完美 但是我想 這足以證明
值得的鏡頭就是值得。請看35頁的第346樓
tracer1000 wrote:
怪了,我也沒在說胖白...(恕刪)
討論如果不能就事論事,流於意氣就已經沒有討論的價值.
胖白與我何干??何必惱羞??
問題不再於胖白,而是您在為A001+1.4X說項的時候引述the-digital-picture的資料.
但別人引用the-digital-picture資料質疑A005的畫質不佳時,卻要別人看實拍.
標準是在於??
至於A005不用拍野鳥,去拍樹上常見的普鳥,您就知道遠近是否有影響了.
言盡於此.
shao-chuan wrote:
T70-300 在3...(恕刪)
Wow, great photos there. Thanks for sharing your pics with us.
I have Tamron A005 and I am super happy with it. Maybe I am lucky with a good copy of A005 but at this price I do think A005 is a geat deal.
Has anyone noticed that between 200~300mm range, Tamron A005 with VC on is far better than my 70~300mm IS? Is it the same case with Nikon 70-300mm VC?
I never trust any review pages on the net because most of them are biased with pressure of marketing their sites. However, I do enjoy checking out photos from Flickr especially from amatures. By checking with Flickr gives me a great idea of how this lens will perfrom in my hands. I am a happy amature photographer by the way. hahaha.
I am suffering from focus-shift with my 550D body and therefor it seems to me Tamron A005 is a lot better on Nikon bodies.
anyway
Cheers and have a nice day.
ks_stone wrote:
問題不再於胖白,而是您在為A001+1.4X說項的時候引述the-digital-picture的資料.
但別人引用the-digital-picture資料質疑A005的畫質不佳時,卻要別人看實拍.
標準是在於??
至於A005不用拍野鳥,去拍樹上常見的普鳥,您就知道遠近是否有影響了.
言盡於此.
我有責怪樓主引用digital picture的比較嗎? 我只是對"整個糊掉"這種詞覺得十分可笑
身為真正的用戶,當然希望能以正視聽,我沒否定胖白的好,哪邊標準不一樣?
鳥拍樹上的才行是嗎?
那就貼張在樹上的鳥吧...不會以為我貼著牠照吧...呵呵
當然如果您要的是那種在畫面上一丁點大的鳥或者要500mm+才拍得到的鳥,拿來嫌T70300,那就有點不厚道了^^
@300mm F5.6
會拍的人,哪個70300都能拍得好..不會拍就算給你300mm F2.8也一樣拍成一整個糊(說不定手振)
好鏡就會有人用,有人用就會有好作品
shao-chuan兄分享的那一樓可以給想買此鏡的朋友作個參考..目前小弟身邊也有兩位朋友也買了此鏡而捨棄原廠,畢竟CP值實在是太高了...
noviceplayer wrote:
I never trust any review pages on the net because most of them are biased with pressure of marketing their sites. However, I do enjoy checking out photos from Flickr especially from amatures. By checking with Flickr gives me a great idea of how this lens will perfrom in my hands. I am a happy amature photographer by the way. hahaha.
這就是為何一堆人除了看鏡頭的"數據"外,也想看"作品"的原因
因為他人的作品才能真正告訴我們鏡頭能做到何種地步,而不只是"單調的數字"
也因此許多人喜歡看"毒照",因為那也代表真正的用戶的表現跟滿意度
東西好不好,真正來自用家的反應應該是值得參考的一部份...
當然比較的數據也不能被忽略,因此東西才有價差...
看你是要用平價買一個已經能拍出90分的畫質,還是要花3-4倍的錢去拍出95分的畫質
這沒有對錯,只有對自己最合適的方案..
小弟不選後者是因為我木眼,分不出五分差在哪邊@@
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X