• 2

想拍飛機運動員的長鏡頭CANON&SIGMA可否幫我分析一下呢


JimHOU wrote:
各位先拜們不好意思想...(恕刪)


以你的需求來說目前只有定焦鏡頭可以輕鬆辦得到?當然機身可能也要考慮至少50D吧連拍速度要快

還有定焦鏡頭只有兩隻比較合乎你的需求 300mm/F 2.8 跟 400mm/F 2.8這兩隻鏡頭
我是用sigma 80-400mm OS APO!配上CANON 7D對焦算快,拍過職棒約有7成都捉焦成功率,只是太重了,1.7KG!用另一顆騰龍28-300MM VC拍,就很差,成功率掉到3~4成而已,而且銳利度比SIGMA差很多!

noviceplayer wrote:
To JimHOUW...(恕刪)


詳盡的分析與解說, 最近也屬意Tamron SP 70-300mm這支
但還有各最終的疑問, "這支與小小白F4 IS的比較"?

除了價格差了二倍多, 去估狗的結果, 在中焦段的影像表現上跟
小小白IS有的拼, 如果就只有差這樣, 那就很有競爭力了
http://www.flickr.com/photos/takey/

aion0100 wrote:
詳盡的分析與解說, ...(恕刪)


Oops... my bad... I forgot to reveal two very important factors I like Tamron more than Canon.


1. FTM (Full Time Manual)
- this is where I love it, it is just too annoying to me when focus ring rotates on my lens. For example, my EF-S 55-250mm sucks at this. And I just found out that EF 70-300mm F4-5.6 IS USM does not support FTM.

2. Non-rotating front barrel
- This is where I love my Tamron A005 and my Canon 15-85mm IS USM the most. My first lens which is EF-S 18-55mm rotates like crazy when focusing... that is really annoying... and to be honest with it, it feels cheap in a bad way... although the kit lens is cheap in the first place.

Once again, please do not buy Tamron A005 if you have EF-S 55-250mm IS. It would be a waste of your money. Why? You might ask.









Scroll down please.



















Scroll down more please.























After you have bought Tamron A005, you would throw your 55-250mm IS out of the window or give it to your friend for free like me. See!!! I told you, you have just wasted your NT$6000. So, that is why I insist buying Tamron A005 is a waste of money if you have bought 55-250mm IS already.
謝謝各位大大
我在上週5已經預定..入手價公司貨15800元
TAMRON 70-300mm(a005)那一支新出的...
但太搶手了所以各地缺貨我已經等了一個星期還沒拿到貨...
希望到時候再來分享...
因為能力有限啦不然我當然想買原廠的啊
我到現在另一支也不是原廠的sigma17-70mm
總之謝謝各位大家的建議囉

takey wrote:
應該是小小白is+1.4x會好一點....

...(恕刪)


恩... 不好喔'' 光圈F4+1.4x 雖然夠遠 但 快門先決 白天很勉強 夜晚很慘

  • 2
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?