http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=757&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=4&API=1&LensComp=738&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=4&APIComp=0
廣角端表現不比胖白還差,但望遠端就不行了...
Tamron 70-300 VC NTD 16000
三倍耶
slrclub的測試:
http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=slr_review&no=188
http://www.flickr.com/photo.gne?id=
可惜沒有掛在apsc上,不然也可以跟55-250做個比較
胖白則真的賣太貴了,一萬多的價差我實在無法下手,所以前幾天只好入手小小白is,然後等待1.4x III上市
如果胖白現在賣四萬就不用猶豫直上胖白囉
R6.2 wrote:
http://www...(恕刪)
Although this website is quite popular but I personally believe "the-digital-picture.com" is pretty biased and does not offer objective review on thrid party lenses.
For example, if you check out how he comments on Sigma 50mm F1.4 then you will see. No matter how good a third party lens is, he always come up with something from Canon and claims that Canon is better.
I browse his website only when I am comparing two Canon lenses.
Cheers and have a nice day.
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X