BlueMoon2100 wrote:
感謝提醒,該網站沒有...(恕刪)
此網站確實沒有P35W-V3的review，但有提到P35X-V3的CPU有以下的情形:
很不幸的，P35X v3延續了一種"limited Turbo"現象，其他搭載4710HQ的筆電在多核心作業下可以turbo boost到3.3 GHz，但是技嘉的筆電只能到3.0 - 3.2 GHz，有時候在3D的應用程式之下作業，甚至會低到2.5 - 3.0 GHz，還會有短暫的降頻現象。
摘錄內文: Unfortunately, the P35X v3 has inherited the phenomenon of a limited Turbo. While other 4710HQ laptops accomplish up to 3.3 GHz in multi-core scenarios, Gigabyte's laptop settled at 3.0 - 3.2 GHz. The clock sometimes even dropped to 2.5 - 3.0 GHz in 3D applications. A short throttling could be observed occasionally.
雖然p35x-v2的i7-4710HQ在某些例子來說會比P35W v2(同樣為i7-4710HQ)的速度來得快些，但是這水平仍追不上同為搭載i7-4710HQ的MSI GT72，MSI GT72在Cinebench R15多核心渲染測試下領先P35X-V3 4%(657 vs. 629 points)，但在Cinebench R11.5底下測試，差幅達6%(7.15 vs. 6.75 points)，與i7-4870HQ 的差距更是巨大，以XMG P505(筆電品牌Schenker's)來說，更差了十幾個百分點。總結就是: 全部的結果測試下來發現，與Aorus' X7 Pro的結果相似，由此得知，Aorus' X7 Pro同時也有此種CPU頻率的問題。
摘錄內文: Although the Core i7-4710HQ calculates faster than in the P35W v2 in some cases, the CPU performance does not quite reach the level of MSI's GT72, which is also based on a 4710HQ. MSI's laptop has a lead of almost 4% in Cinebench R15 multi-core rendering (657 vs. 629 points). On the other hand, the difference is approximately 6% in Cinebench R11.5 (7.15 vs. 6.75 points). The gap with the Core i7-4870HQ is even bigger. Schenker's XMG P505 achieved over 10% more in this test. Overall, the results are similar to that of Aorus' X7 Pro that also struggles with CPU clock issues.
----------------------------------------------------------------
看到P35X-V3是如此，連P35W-V2都不敢看了，誰叫自己沒好好多做一點功課
