想請問一下vn7 591G這台筆電
因為想一次弄到定位
所以i5跟i7的版本考慮很久
有人是說i5玩遊戲夠
有人說i7 4核心才跑的順
我一般是玩一些單機遊戲 像看門狗 大革命
現在是擔心筆電散熱功能不好
i7的溫度壓不下去
所以想請教一下各位的意見
謝謝
江崎英治 wrote:
建議用i5版本即可 i7首先怕溫度壓不下去外 有多數遊戲並不支援8個執行緒同時運算
買上去用不到那麼多效能與運送能力就浪費了
有錯麻煩指正
我覺得你只講對一半
下圖是我用vn7 591G(i7-4710HQ版)跑Assassin's Creed大革命巴黎街道時(特效開最高，1080P)
用AIDA64監控CPU使用狀況
會發現CPU資源大概最高會用到50%，也就是說這個遊戲至少用滿4線程
我可以確定GPU滿檔，但CPU只跑50%沒有降頻狀況，所以散熱是OK的
可是如果i7現在就用滿4線程且跑了50%效能，雖然離用光8個執行緒還有距離
那不就表示i5必須用滿4線程且跑了近100%效能嗎?
現在860M滿檔+i7跑50%不降頻，但860M滿檔+i5跑100%也能不降頻不LAG嗎?我懷疑
那未來其他遊戲860M滿檔+i7還是CPU最高只會用到50%嗎?那i5還夠用嗎?
i7效能過剩沒錯卻可防止降頻，但i5我懷疑真的不夠用~
招牛寶兔 wrote:
不同架構的東西能這樣比嗎
怎麼我覺得很像在硬坳了
你當我亂講的喔?要不要看看專業網站怎麼說?
Assassin's Creed大革命的狀況(PS4版只有900P)
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-assassins-creed-unity-face-off
However, bearing in mind the lofty recommend specs suggested, it is possible to get a console-beating experience on relatively modest hardware. We paired a Core i3 4130 with a GTX 750 Ti, set PC presets to console equivalents (though we swapped in HBAO+ for a bit of a quality boost) and ran at 1600x900 (900p). In essence we pitted console-level PC tech against PS4 and Xbox One and found that the game ran fairly well. We locked frame-rate to 30fps using Riva Tuner Statistics Server and, cut-scene stutters aside, frame-rates held up in 26-30fps territory.
其中860M約等同於750TI這眾所皆知
而HBAO+還只有PC版ACU才有，PS4版只有SSAO
再來是看門狗的狀況(PS4版只有900P)
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-watch-dogs-face-off
We also tried the GTX 760 and found that frame-rate varied uncomfortably around 30-40fps, and found that pursuing improved visuals at a locked 30fps was a better option than attempting to hit 60fps. Here we could have ultra-level presets with temporal SMAA at 1080p. Dropping down to the GTX 750 Ti gave us the same experience at the high quality level - effectively a match for PS4, but with a full 1080p resolution.
招牛寶兔 wrote:
樓上講的可是1920*1080阿 可不是1600*900
你的樓上在哪裡?開版可沒說一定要1080P
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X