國內最近ACC追撞工程車的事件逐漸引起大眾矚目,
我認為這類ADAS系統用上癮以後,
會改變駕駛的習慣,可能更不專注前方路況而有不良影響。
雖然AI人工智慧已發展了幾十年,至今卻仍不算成熟,
把公眾的行車安全依賴於這種FUZZY的辨識率,不免令人擔憂。
成熟的主動安全配備,例如:ABS、ESC等,
能達到真正可靠的安全效果,自然要大力推廣、強制車廠安裝。
而ADAS在某些車廠的吹噓下,讓消費者有過度的期待,
甚至忽略了這種不成熟的AI系統是隨時可能出狀況的。
ABS出錯的機率可能只有萬分之一,
即使出錯時也不致造成太大的損害。
而ADAS出錯的機率可能大於百分之一,
一旦出錯就可造成車輛全毀甚至波及其他人車的安全。
所以學術界應該有針對這個問題進行研究才對,
究竟使用ADAS駕駛輔助系統會不會改變駕駛人的行為?
GOOGLE了一下發現這類研究還不少,
許多結論是肯定的,ADAS會讓駕駛人變得更不專注路況、更願意冒險。
例如這篇,https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10111-020-00658-5
全文很長,摘取部分結論,
Our results showed that drivers significantly reduced their time headway in all post-automation drives, compared to a Baseline Manual Drive. This is in line with the findings of both Skottke et al. (2014), Eick and Debus (2005), who showed that drivers reduced their time headway after being decoupled from highly automated driving and truck platoons. This pattern has also been observed in a study on drivers’ behavioral adaptation after using full-range ACC (Varotto et al. 2020).
That is, drivers were not aware that they had changed their behaviour, even in the short THW condition, which they overwhelmingly rated as unsafe. This is not surprising, as previous studies have shown that individuals are not always aware of how the use of technology can change their behaviour; for example, the effect negative effect of using a mobile phone while driving on performance and mental processing (Boase, Hannigan and Porter 1988; Alm and Nilsson 1995).
也就是說,司機沒有意識到他們已經改變了自己的行為,即使在短暫的THW條件下,他們壓倒性地將其評為不安全。這並不奇怪,因為以前的研究表明,個人並不總是意識到技術的使用如何改變他們的行為;例如,在駕駛時使用手機對性能和心理處理的影響(Boase,漢尼根和波特1988;阿爾姆和尼爾森1995)。
john65537 wrote:
使用ADAS者能否自(恕刪)
這類事情, 學界有研究過
https://case.ntu.edu.tw/blog/?p=38546
內文搜尋

X