newman1030 wrote:
就算加了雪胎,連用絞...(恕刪)
看不懂影片裡的德文沒關係
這裡有英文的
http://fourtitude.rely.net/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/6/1102
別跟我說英文的你也看不懂…
ps. 不是要說subaru不如audi，純粹是針對audi的那個ski jump廣告
E46_330i wrote:
看不懂影片裡的德文沒...(恕刪)
不太懂大大您在生氣什麼,我只是說出我看到的東西而已
雪胎:
絞盤:
你貼的那篇報導,也沒題到那台A6 4.2 quattro是用什麼胎爬上去的阿.至於絞盤,你的文章中說那是因為不用絞盤車子就會滑下去,只是影片中看起來繩子從頭就是拉緊的狀態,因此才讓人臆測是否是靠絞盤才拉上去的.
還是說除了絞盤這段外,您貼的文章還有其他的重點呢?
比較現行款式的市售車 S3 跟 STI
加速 STI 穩贏
轉彎 STI 穩贏
樂趣 STI 應該贏在 可調性大 改裝性大
方便性 STI 贏在四個門 至少兩者都是掀背
售後服務 台灣不清楚 不管在哪 我自己很少回原廠被坑
虛榮心 見仁見智
售價 STI 省很多
油耗 STI 似乎會輸 但是應該半斤八兩
外觀 見仁見智 我覺得兩者都好看
車子出毛病的機率 這一代不知道統計出來沒 兩部車都還算新
安全性 慢慢開最安全
Jaku 峠
newman1030 wrote:
不太懂大大您在生氣什麼,我只是說出我看到的東西而已
雪胎:
絞盤:
你貼的那篇報導,也沒題到那台A6 4.2 quattro是用什麼胎爬上去的阿.至於絞盤,你的文章中說那是因為不用絞盤車子就會滑下去,只是影片中看起來繩子從頭就是拉緊的狀態,因此才讓人臆測是否是靠絞盤才拉上去的.
沒在生氣，我又不是audi車迷，audi的車子我只喜歡它的內裝而已。
只是都貼了連結出來了還懶得看…
你要的答案就在這兩段裡
“Safety first” was the underlying principle for the entire project. Keeping the car in the steeply angled position at the top of the jump was the biggest challenge. As soon as it stopped there it would immediately slide back again. The A6 therefore had to be “held on to” at the top. To solve this problem, an ingenious system was fixed to the ski jump and to the bottom of the car. The “roll-back safety device” was equipped with three independent systems. It was located on a steel baseplate and weighed around 65 kilograms. This “sled” was installed to the underbody of the 335 bhp Audi A6 (1.9 tonnes) and merely served to prevent the car from sliding back; it was not able to pull it.
[刪]
The Audi A6 4.2 quattro with 6-speed tiptronic that drove up the ski jump was otherwise a perfectly normal production version. Two minor exceptions: the automatic transmission was kept in first gear – the slight power loss that occurs when changing gear would have made it impossible to climb such a steep gradient – and the six-millimetre spikes on the tyres. Tyres of this kind are also used in rallying.
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X