ACON99 wrote:
畢竟Bugatti的特殊輪胎的確可提供大於1的摩擦係數...(恕刪)
你從哪裏推斷出他用到摩擦係數大於1的輪胎??
除了釘鞋、魔鬼氈、履帶之類的,我想像不出有摩擦係數大於1的輪胎...
熱融胎的摩擦係數有超過1嗎...
====
我一直建立不起來摩擦係數超過1的概念,
因為,若我在推一個摩擦係數超過1的物品,
我除了推不動這東西,反而被這鬼東西倒推回來...
我是不是錯了??
ACON99 wrote:
摩擦係數只是正向力跟...(恕刪)
呵,
我不知道被哪個時期的老師給害慘了,他在上課時說沒有摩擦係數大於1這個東西,
他還舉例說如果有,把它作成手套,戴著去爬芉,掛在竿上,自己就能往上爬,所以沒這東西(他在說作用力與摩擦力反向).
真是太靠北邊走咧,害我記到現在,
一直建立不起來摩擦係數大於1的概念,我前面說會被反推回來,也是那個老師說的...
The 2006 F1 cars have a power-to-weight ratio of 1,250 hp/t (0.93 kW/kg). Theoretically this would allow the car to reach 100 km/h (60 mph) in less than 1 second. However the massive power cannot be converted to motion at low speeds due to traction loss and the usual figure is 2 seconds to reach 100 km/h (60 mph). After about 130 km/h (80 mph) traction loss is minimal due to the combined effect of the car moving faster and the downforce, hence the car continues accelerating at a very high rate. The figures are (for the 2006 Renault R26):[citation needed]
0 to 100 km/h (62 mph): 1.7 seconds
0 to 200 km/h (124 mph): 3.8 seconds
0 to 300 km/h (186 mph): 8.6 seconds*
*Figures are heavily dependent on aerodynamic setup and gearing.
The acceleration figure is usually 1.45 g (14.2 m/s2) up to 200 km/h (124 mph), which means the driver is pushed back in the seat at an acceleration 1.45 times gravity
ACON99 wrote:
http://en....(恕刪)
是基本觀念錯了,不是引的內容錯了~~
ACON99 wrote:
The acceleration figure is usually 1.45 g (14.2 m/s2) up to 200 km/h (124 mph), which means the driver is pushed back in the seat at an acceleration 1.45 times gravity....(恕刪)
所以F1輪胎摩擦係數為1.45??
錯了!!
請你回歸最簡單的物理原則,你可能就會想到錯在哪裏了,
我花了一天的時間想,你也花點時間想吧~~
bull5444 wrote:
是基本觀念錯了,不是...(恕刪)
官方Bugatti 輪胎扭力資料
Rear transverse lock and centre lock fully variable
Centre lock moment 1,720 Nm
Transverse lock moment 1,800 Nm
Max. wheel moment front 2,000 Nm per wheel
Max. wheel moment rear 4,200 Nm per wheel
Launch start
Front 1,820 Nm
Rear 4,200 Nm
Full-load acceleration from 80 km/h
Front 1,050 Nm
Rear 3,700 Nm
Handling Nurburgring
Front 2,000 Nm
Rear 3,400 Nm
我算出來的摩擦係數大於1.6...
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X