Let me share my thought to you. I understand your eagerness now. I faced the same situation last week.
I am using M240 + M lenses. I also used A7II and M-lenses. My friend used A7R2 + M-lenses (I tried his A7R2). I was thinking whether to upgrade to SL. I finally upgraded on last Sat (used for 1.5 days). My thoughts are:
1. A7R2 +Mlenses are already very good. A7R2's EVF is easy to use M-lenses. Advantage of using Sony is that with the V-M close focusing ring, you can focus with M-lens even closer. For SL, minimum disctance is 0.7m or 1m (for 0.95);
2. A7R2 is lighter and smaller, easy to carry and operate. SL is heavier and a bit bigger. But still ok. A7R2's images are also acceptable. But I found that Sony images still contained a bit of slight yellow-green tone, especially indoor photos under tungsten. But SL does not have such yellow-green tone. My 240 also does not haev such yellow-green tone. I would say Leica body + Leica lense would give better colour tone and sharpeness.
3. Although A7R2's EVF is already very good, SL's EVF is even better, further facilitating your MF. SL's EVF is definitely an upgrade practically.
4. I also like B/W photos. SL's B/W tone is really better than Sony. If you like B/W and do not own Q, then this is additional advantage for you.
5. After all, it would be your own thought to see what you want and whether you think worthwhile to spend money to ger marginal benefit. A7R2 is already very good, but SL is really even better (as expected). But SL is more than double the price of that of Sony A7R2. This depends on whether you are willing to spend, and aim for the best ot highest quality.
I am using the SL very happily.
Hope this can help.
Andy
Taikong wrote:
我快忍不住啦, 本...(恕刪)
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X