Apology to write you in English. May be I can share my thoughts on your question. To answer your question, perhaps, you can look at various Leica line-up, in terms of Leica color tuning or sensor manipulation approach. Leica Q is more towards Panasonic color rendition. Leica M10 is wonderful but in my opinion, suffered from 'wrong' AWB preset, ie, Sunshine setting at 5450K So, most photo on M10 is too yellowish. Leica M10R is exactly like Q2. M10R has sunshine preset at 4950K, and its color accuracy is on the cool side and pale. Great potential because of high resolution for cropping. In general, a precise and pale color, much like the Q2, and many people do not like that.
M11 is more in line with what you see on SL2 or SL2s. It is a modern color with vibrancy. No, it is not M9. CCD vs CMOS continues to have gaps albeit, the gap is getting smaller and smaller. M11 keeps the traditional M character but with a modern twist. The colors are rich and yet sensational and 3D. I sold my M10r to get M11. At first, I thought I am wasting my money but I was wrong. I am really happy with M11, exceeds my expectation. I think, if time is not immediate concern, get a cheap M10 or M10R but be prepared to upgrade in 2 years to M11. If you can afford, go for M11 and you don't have to worry about your camera for at least 10 years. Resolution on most lens from Leica or others are perfectly fine to cater to 60M resolution. Leica wants you to think they cannot handle but that is just a marketing gimmicks.
Another side benefit of M11, which is rarely being discussed, is that while using live view, M11 actually has image stabilization, at the screen LCD level. It makes using adapted lens so much easier and pleasant. Although the EVF is too expensive, I am certainly willing to purchase one when the price is more reasonable and enjoy adapter lens (non rangefinder coupled). The sensor on M11 turns all these non-native lens into wonder. Above are my personal thoughts. Take them with some salt. Thanks.