剛入手ak100,第一次買這麼貴的訊源,感覺跟之前的訊源是不同世界的聲音,真的有嚇到我了,剛好又看到Sony zx1這台好像很不錯,有想升級的衝動,請問這兩台會差很多嗎?值不值得再花錢升級呢?
jacky8087 wrote:
新改版是指mkII ...(恕刪)
在英國版Stuff網站對於AK100 MK2的介紹中,有將AK100 MK2與ZX1做相互比較,給各位大大參考
在音色部分,文章提到 "Sony NWZ-ZX1的聲音精確度比AK100 MK2表現更好。"
(原文: When it comes to precision, Sony’s NWZ-ZX1 has the edge. The A&K just can’t match it for rhythmic precision. But that’s not necessarily a disadvantage: the A&K has a more relaxed vibe that many will prefer.)
總結部分,文章說 "對於AK100 MK2來說,真正的問題來自於Sony ZX1。兩者的聲音表現不同,但是各有所長。因此,假如你喜歡更友善、流暢的操作介面,Sony ZX1她那更具競爭力的價格和多樣化的功能,會讓你最後決定遠離AK100 MK2"
(原文:The real problem, though, is the Sony NWZ-ZX1. They sound different, but just as good as one another, so unless you’re especially drawn to a warmer, more fluid playback style, the lower cost and added usability of the Sony is likely to push your decision away from the A&K.)
(以上翻譯若有誤請再糾正

小白K wrote:
總結部分,文章說 "對於AK100 MK2來說,真正的問題來自於Sony ZX1。兩者的聲音表現不同,但是各有所長。因此,假如你喜歡更友善、流暢的操作介面,Sony ZX1她那更具競爭力的價格和多樣化的功能,會讓你最後決定遠離AK100 MK2"
(原文:The real problem, though, is the Sony NWZ-ZX1. They sound different, but just as good as one another, so unless you’re especially drawn to a warmer, more fluid playback style, the lower cost and added usability of the Sony is likely to push your decision away from the A&K.)
您"unless"沒翻出來,這樣意思可能會剛好相反?
因此,"除非"你特別喜歡較溫暖的聲音、更流暢的播放風格,不然Sony ZX1她那更具競爭力的價格和多樣化的功能,會讓你最後決定遠離AK100 MK2"
內文搜尋

X