vetvic wrote:
" EPSON JS-02Z "有人只賣NT25X
看起來是同樣的東西
不一樣不要打我!...(恕刪)
哈哈
看起來真是一樣的
可能都是同廠家 OEM 打上不同 mark
至少大家又學了令人大開眼界的一課
不過也是有人願意花幾千塊買 radius DDM
billliu wrote:
哈哈看起來真是一樣的...(恕刪)
epson和fujitsu 應該是一樣的
但和 Radius DDM 應該還是有段差距!
耳機影響聲音表現的東西很多
1.線材 ,光用肉眼看線材的粗細就差很多的,而線材真的有影響,大家不是在網上看網友在討論換線,換線假如沒差,大家會花那麼多心思!
2.耳機殼,fujitsu的DDM耳機殼 明顯比radius單薄很多,這也會影響音質
3.配戴方式
fujitsu DDM,不是Epson這支才是C/P王
他是這附近的價位帶耳機,中低音很大約很難有敵手
但並不是意味他真的可跟Radius ddm比,不過她到是讓我體會DDM的特色
而他的音質也不見得對每個人的胃口!
最像radius ddm的是這支
brookstone Clear Dual-Drive Earbuds with Mic for iPod, iPhone and iPad Devices
大約US$65=NT$1917
網友說音質像Radius DDM 一代,跟2代還是有點差距!
vetvic wrote:
並不是意味他真的可跟Radius ddm比,不過她到是讓我體會DDM的特色...(恕刪)
小弟也沒聽過 radius
以下是 head-fi 上 ljokerl 大大的聽感
Radius HP-TWF11R Pro “DDM”
It presents an exquisitely blended sound that’s refined enough for the tiniest details to make themselves quite obvious.
The bass of the HP-TWF11R is the foundation for the robustness of their sound signature. It is very extended, competing with my Monster Turbine Pro Gold and Future Sonics Atrios, and provides a bit of rumble and plenty of impact.
The midrange is fluid and coherent, not at all veiled but not forward as with the ATH-CK100 or thick as with the Ortofon e-Q7. It lacks the absolute transparency of the whimsical Yuin OK1 but still manages to be quite competent in expressing the emotion in vocals. The DDM shines when it comes to reproducing stringed instruments.
The same goes for the treble of the DDM – it is equally polite and very clear but lacks the crispness and energy of the treble produced by certain armature-based earphones.
In terms of presentation, the DDM is a very airy earphone. The soundstage has very good width and depth and an ‘out of the head’ feel, seemingly compounded by the size of the earphones themselves. I’m not a big proponent of portable amps but if the DDM is your be-all, end-all earphone, a decent amp may be worth the investment.
最有資格出來出來發表兩者聽感,是當初挖這個淺坑給大家跳的amibalala

我只算踢了幾位入坑
It presents an exquisitely blended sound that’s refined enough for the tiniest details to make themselves quite obvious.
這英文說Radius DDM 細節表現很好--->
>> Fuji 這支在中低頻不錯,高頻OK,三頻細節還是比不上中價位動鐵!
The bass of the HP-TWF11R is the foundation for the robustness of their sound signature.......
The midrange is fluid and coherent....
but still manages to be quite competent in expressing the emotion in vocals
這兩段講radius 中低音不錯,中音的有比不上..但人聲上還是能表達聲音的情感
>>fuji的調音有問題,不錯又大聲中低音使得人聲在後,且相對的小聲沒細節,假如音樂中低音沒大大聲,則人聲OK
The same goes for the treble of the DDM – it is equally polite and very clear..
DDM 高音溫和但清楚...但比不上一些動鐵,
>>我沒聽過radius,但同感!或著高音比Radius 還弱!
The soundstage has very good width and depth and an ‘out of the head’ feel,
radius 給人既深又廣的音場有種out of the head的感覺
>>同感! Fuji最讓我印象深刻的是音場,跟我的一些小耳罩有的拚,再來是中低音很好!
內文搜尋

X