耕太郎 wrote:
ZX1 才出來沒多久,就被幹掉了...
...(恕刪)
沒有把?
你是說Hugo嗎? 一個是隨身聽, 一個是隨身DAC, 不能說是誰幹掉誰
我之前用ZX1聽過Stage4的感想是還好
目前看起來是因為ZX1還無法完全解放Stage4
Chord Hugo最吸引我的地方是他效果好又夠"隨身"
雖然stanley評論他不夠隨身
但像我在家裡聽的時間少, 用耳罩, 在公司聽得多, 用耳道
Chord Hugo大小已足夠讓我帶者在家裡跟公司兩邊用, "定點使用的移動耳機系統"
這大小, 已經很突破了
只是我很擔心一點, 一般鋰電池壽命大概就2~3年
Hugo換電池應該不容易, 如果能像手機一樣使用者自己可以換就不錯 呵呵
未來有個人會需要你
ar3a wrote:我之前用ZX1聽過Stage4的感想是還好
目前看起來是因為ZX1還無法完全解放Stage4
器材搭配本來就說不得準，然而個人口味也是關鍵，說不定，Stage 4的聲線就是不合兄的喜好，這也是很正常的事。
選你所愛，愛你所選，1964 V6s也是極好的選擇。
圖片引用來源：Sound News
從上圖可看出這電池是有焊點的，也不是不能自己換啦，可能需要幫忙就是了，等電池壽終正寢，保固也老早到期，該拆就拆吧。
Chord愛用國貨，英國Enix Energy出產鋰離子電池。不用鋰聚合物大概是因為成本考量，否則體積可以再縮小些，副作用是續航力會下降。
但話說回來，體積再小，連接端子就又更擠，勢必得犧牲掉幾個 I/O的端子，這絕非消費者之福，也限制了用途，降低競爭力。
因此，產品設計真的不像我憨人一般想的這麼簡單。
又不是 耳罩
Hi Stanley,
X2 has a additional resistor that damps the bass and middle frequencies. Additionally I put in other capacitors to modulate the high mids. The additional resistor doesn't make the X2 inferior, it's absolutely usual to use small resistor values to bring the intensity and impedances of the drivers into balance. All In-Ear manufacturers do it.
“X2多了一個電阻來減低(damps-緩阻)低頻與中頻的量感。另外，我也使用了些電容來為中高頻調音(modulate)。這些多加的電容與電阻並不會影響到X2的音質。使用小阻值的電阻來調和單體間的量感與阻抗是相當常見的做法，所有的耳道式耳機廠商皆如此做。“
Now to the idea of the Xcontrol. We wanted to create a new model that suits to the needs of our clients who are musicians.The idea was having a big attanuation on the bass and lower mids, increasing the soundstage and with this the details of the signal. We assumed that this version would not suit to the needs of most audiophiles, so the idea came up to offer two versions. One with high attenuation on the bass and lower mids (x2) and the other one not touched (x1). To make it more comfortable to compare them, we had the idea of putting a switch on the Demo unit. And this brought us to the conclusion to offer the switchable version also.
”現在來談談X Control的概念。我們一開始是想要開發一個新的型號來符合我們那些音樂家客戶的需求，作法是把低頻與中低頻做大幅度的衰減從而加大音場並讓細節浮現。這個版本我們猜想可能不符合耳機燒友的口味，因此我們決定開發兩個版本-低頻與中低頻有衰減的稱作X2，而X1是沒有衰減的版本。為了要更容易比較兩個版本的差異，我們想到了在試聽機上加上切換開關。這個做法讓我們決定也供應可以切換的版本。“
It's more complex then most people think. When i had the idea of the switch I also thought it would be easy but the more I completed the crossover the more I found out how complex it is. It's rather easy to develop two different sounding In-Ears with the same drivers, but as soon as you put a switch between both crossover, they are connected on several points and they interact to each other. So I always had to keep the interaction in mind when changing one part on one of these crossovers.
"開發可切換版本的複雜度比一般人想像的要高。當我開始構思的時候我也以為非常容易，然而當我越接近完成整個分音網路的時候，我越發現這比我想像的要複雜。使用同樣的單體組合來開發兩種完全不同聲底走向的耳機相對來說容易很多，但當你把這個開關放進這兩組分音網路裡的時候，你會發現這是牽一髮動全身的影響。所以當我在實驗替換分音器的元件時，我得時時刻刻把元件互相影響的變數列入考慮。“
The differences between both versions are very noticable, but they are NOT two completely different sound characteristics. This would be too complex. People can choose between „powerful" or „balanced" sound. And who like both can choose the Xcontrol version to have both.
"兩個版本間的差異是顯著的，但並不是兩種完全不同的聲音走向--我不想搞得太複雜。用家可以自己決定要比較有”低頻權威感“(powerful)或比較“整體平衡‘(balanced)的版本。而想兩者皆擁有的就選擇X Control的版本。"
The component of the switch is very high quality. It's been tested in terms of durability and resistance against humidity. It is able to last for minimum 50.000 cycles/clicks and passed through environmental tests which include damp heat, artificial sweat test, temperature cycle (hot to cold to hot etc). We give an extended guarantee of 3 years on this component.
"這個開關的品質非常高，在耐用度與抗濕性都經過測試，它最少可以承受50,000次的來回扳動(cycle，所以來回算一次)，而且也通過了包括溼熱環境，汗水侵蝕，大溫差交替(熱到冷到熱)等耐候性測試。我們對於這顆開關提供額外的三年保固。“
Hope this helps you. If you have any further questions, please let me know.
All the best
Marcel
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X