ar3a wrote:
請問stanley ...(恕刪)
根據Rob本人的說法（請參閲前面翻譯之文章），Hugo本身有電池過充保護機制，持續插電當電池充飽後就只會停止（白燈熄滅）或緩充（trickle charge），原則上不會有問題。
他本人在Head Fi的某一篇回答有說過他的Hugo就是一直插著電的，且電池是唯一的電力來源，不會因為充飽就改以變壓器來的DC供電。
ar3a wrote:
請問stanley ...(恕刪)
我是一直用另一組鋰電池插著
一直對Hugo充電中.這樣對聲音也有幫助
瓦特說.....答：當外接電源變壓器插上的時候，如果電池已經充飽，那麼內部的邏輯會讓它進入持續提供電流模式（constant current mode）或是什麼都不做。Hugo的電源一直是由電池來提供。對於插或不插變壓器，我聽不出太大的差異。（編按：不見得沒有差異，只是聽不聽得出來）
ar3a兄殼子與RCA對不準的問解決了嗎??
我有回文.或許您沒有看到
http://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=180&t=3814233&p=9#49789406
ar3a wrote:
我真的沒看到...拍...(恕刪)
不好意思.少寫了一個動作......把光纖輸入的塞子拔出.才能移動電路板
前文已經更正補充了
把光纖輸入的塞子拔出.將電路板4個方向輕輕移動
找到正確位置.電路板就會定位.完成沉下去(我的也是電路板沒定位)
DAC部分：Hugo比AURALiC VEGA在mid-bass呈現出的重量/暖度及衝擊性略微優異，但透明度與解析度則輸給VEGA (以下節錄Chris的評論)
Hugo offered slightly greater mid-bass weight, warmth, and punch than the VEGA did, plus what some might regard as a smoother, more rounded, more ‘luminous,’ and thus more engaging midrange presentation.
On the other hand, I found that the Hugo offered a somewhat less transparent and less sharply defined overall sound than the VEGA, with noticeably less upper midrange and treble resolution and focus.
AMP部分：Chris認為Hugo就像是台輕量版的TAURUS MKII，呈現出極為優異且從低阻耳道到高阻耳罩通用的推力與淨度，無需增益調整便能通用於各種耳機。
The Hugo’s amplifier section in many respects sounded like a ‘junior’ version of the excellent AURALiC TAURUS MkII—a comment I intend as high praise. Although the Chord offers less power in an absolute sense than the TAURUS MkII, and provides single-ended outputs only, the Hugo still shares a number of positive sonic attributes with the bigger desktop unit. In particular, both the Chord and the TAURUS MkII possess similar, Neve recording console-like voicing characteristics that consistently find that elusive sweet spot between resolution and sonic transparency on the one hand and full-bodied, soulful musicality on the other.
One crucial point to note about the Hugo amplifier is that it is so quiet and offers such a wide range of volume settings that it easily can be used with everything from super-sensitive custom-fit in-ear monitors right on up to the most power- hungry headphones you can find. Granted, some competing portables address this problem by offering switch-selectable master gain settings, but the Hugo is so very quiet that it has no need of them! With the Hugo, you just plug in your listening devices of choice (whatever they might be), set volume levels accordingly, and enjoy.
儘管Hugo不如AURALiC VEGA銳利，但Chris對於Hugo以一台可攜式DAC/AMP一體機，達到近乎可與AURALiC VEGA及TAURUS MKII系統相同的表現，大為驚訝與稱讚，特別是Hugo不到AURALiC系統一半的售價，卻可以滿足各種使用情境，Chris推薦Hugo為可攜式DAC/AMP一體機唯一首選。
While I preferred the more sharply focused sound of my reference AURALiC headphone system to the Hugo overall, I was nevertheless impressed to hear how close the Hugo came to the reference system’s performance. When you consider that the Hugo can be had for less than half the price, and comes in a package small enough to take with you wherever you go, its appeal becomes irresistible.
They say no product can hope to be all things to all people, but in the world of high-performance headphone amps and DACs, Chord’s Hugo comes a lot closer than most. If I could have one (and only one) headphone amplifier/DAC with which to satisfy all real-world use conditions and listening requirements, this would be the one I’d choose.
lovelyleica wrote:
五月份的HiFi+雜...(恕刪)
先前翻譯的Rob Watts專訪，作者Richard Becker，自己在評測時也有比較過Vega與Hugo，他看來是個Hugo的鐵粉，他認為Vega的解析是暴力破解式，而Hugo的解析透明度比較自然。
能同時聽過兩台的用家不多，因此各位看倌就自行理解與揣測吧。
與MSB，dCS等以DAC出名的廠家來比，Hugo的表現必定不夠全面，但可稱體質良好，具多工性，體積袖珍，且對於以桌上電腦或隨身訊源為主的用家非常友善，是個可以投資的中程目標。
再加一個好消息 ，Becker（他本身也是個Audio Dealer）已經收到第三批的Hugo，他証實同軸RCA孔也已經改大，可以相容大部份的發燒線材（我的第二版不行，已哭⋯），因此在觀望的心癢燒友們可以準備一下出門試聽了。
北部我知道代理商（在民生東路上）可試聽。
中部ME。
南部目前似乎沒有。
以上請幫忙補充。
對於以USB線材作為主要連接介面的燒友（Hugo的USB可支援DXD，DoP，DSD 64/128,基本上是未來10年的格式），卻又擔心USB的聲音沒有同軸好，Richard Becker自行測試出了一個USB轉同軸的方式，據說能再把音質向上提昇一個層次。這邊是相關連結。看是否有勇者可以幫大家驗證一下。
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X