小弟也有意來訂製一支
但看JH 16 PRO斯乎比較和胃口（也比較便宜）
但台灣分享文實在少
不知除了音悅還有哪邊可訂製
跟ue18比起來又如何
ue18價錢貴上不少
所以才考慮jh
大家意見不知道如何？
不過說實在的，JH單位比較多，價錢又比較便宜。我爬文時後得到的心得是，由於是同一個創辦人，音樂風格也很相似。再說，在台灣，也只有一個JH16 Demo 可以試聽.所以我才決定JH16的。不過我想，不管你訂了任何一個，都會很滿意的。兩者都代表了當今鐵動的巔峰了。
你還可以參考 Headphones.com 說編輯的一個PDF檔案，叫 Guide to Earphones and Custom-fit In-ear Monitors. 他們把目前市場上大部分熱門的耳塞式耳機跟客制耳機都做了詳細的對比跟評論。裡面有包括了JH16跟UE 最新的 IERM.這個文件你可以上網找找，他們的網站應該有。是個很不錯的評論。當然，只有英文版的。。。呵呵呵。。。
下面是我從裡面貼出一段拿JH 跟 UE 做對比的。這個guide裡面也有對這兩個IEM的詳細介紹。有需要我再想辦法PO出來吧。。先看看他們怎麼比較這兩款IEM的。 (UE 的 IERM 的全文是 In Ear Reference Monitor)。要注意這個是拿JH16跟UE IERM做對比，而不是跟 18pro比。你可以做個參考。
Ultimate Ears IERM vs.
JH Audio JH16 Pro
×The IERM costs $150 less than the JH 16 Pro.
×The IERM is a three-way, 3-driver design, while
the JH 16 Pro is a three-way, 8-driver design.
×Up to this point, the JH 16 Pro has been
Playback's reigning neutrality champ, so we
were eager to compare the IERM to what we
considered our gold standard. Here's how
that comparison plays out. Both monitors
offer excellent neutrality and overall balance,
though their voicing is not, strictly speaking,
identical.
*The IERM offers powerful low bass and
remains almost perfectly balanced from
the bottom end all the way up through the
midrange and lower treble regions, with just a
hint of top end roll-off.
*In comparison with the IERM, the JH16 Pro
also offers potent bass, but with perhaps
not quite as powerful a deep low-end
presentation as the IERM; the JH16 Pro's
mids and highs therefore sound just a hair
more prominent than its low-end does. The
JH16 Pro's treble response is beautifully
extended and shows no signs of roll-off at all.
*If you consider the response curves of the
IERM and JH16 PRO side-by-side, the IERM
sounds beautifully smooth and balanced, but
just a touch more warmly balanced (because
of its subtle treble roll-off). In turn, the JH16
Pro sounds nearly as smooth and equally
well-balanced, but with a subtle touch of
midrange/upper-midrange forwardness,
which I attribute to the fact that the JH16
Pro's bass range response is pulled back
ever-so-slightly vis-?vis its midrange and
treble response.
*So which is the neutrality champ? I'll give the
nod to the IERM, by the slightest of margins.
*Resolution: In terms of ability to resolve fine,
low-level textural and transient details both
monitors are good, but the JH 16 Pro enjoys
a narrow edge, in part because its extended
but unexaggerated treble response makes
details easy to discern, yet without imposing
any sort etched or artificially spotlighted?
sound.
*The earpiece designs of the IERM and JH
16 PRO are conceptually similar, as both
use solid acrylic earpiece designs. Yet in
terms of execution the IERM and JH 16
PRO earpieces aren't least in the case of
my review samples' unctionally different.
My JH16 Rro's are extremely easy to fit and
remove (the best custom-fit models I've tried
in this respect), but they do not offer the
last word in noise isolation, which suggests
to me that the earpieces may fit a bit more
loosely than some competing custom-fit
earpieces do. In contrast, the IERM's offer
a subtly tighter fit (yet one that is still quite
comfortable, once you get them properly
inserted) and concomitantly better noise
isolation (UE claims -26 dB for the standard
versions with acrylic housings, though a
special-order, soft-silicon version boosts
isolation to a whopping -32 dB). So good is
the UE fit that I would rate it second only to
the Sensaphonics 2MAX monitors in terms of
noise isolation, which is most impressive.
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X