7.3 Nokia -- Remains in first place with good scores on toxics use reduction, but loses points on energy. More... 6.9 Sony Ericsson -- Moves up with top marks on toxics elimination but weak on recycling. More... 5.3 Toshiba -- Good score on toxics elimination but needs to meet upcoming phase out commitment by March 2010. More... 5.3 Philips -- Loses points for failing to lobby for phase out of hazardous substance in legislation. More... 5.1 Apple -- Continues to improve, scoring best on eliminating toxic chemicals and e-waste criteria. More... 5.1 LG Electronics -- LG score improves, but is still penalized for postponing date for toxics phase out. More... 5.1 Sony -- Maintains overall score with better energy total, but needs to lobby for stronger chemicals legislation. More... 5.1 Motorola -- Slightly reduced score, due to lack of lobbying for stronger chemicals legislation. More... 5.1 Samsung == Big drop due to penalty point for failing to meet commitment to phase out hazardous substances. More... 4.9 Panasonic -- Score unchanged, strongest on energy but poor on e-waste and recycling. More... 4.7 HP -- Improved position thanks to clear support for global emissions reductions, but needs to lobby for improved chemical legislation. More... 4.5 Acer == Score unchanged but Acer is lobbying for stronger chemicals legislation. More... 4.5 Sharp -- Loses points due to poor information on toxics elimination and fails to support stronger chemicals legislation. More... 3.9 Dell == Reduced score on energy criteria and penalty point for delaying toxics phase out till 2011. More... 3.5 Fujitsu -- Improved score due to support for global carbon emission reductions and cutting its own emissions. More... 2.5 Lenovo -- Score unchanged, with penalty point for indefinite delay on toxics phase out. More... 2.4 Microsoft -- Reduced score, fails to support strong chemicals legislation. More... 1.4 Nintendo == Nintendo remains in last place with the same score. More...