高ISO比拼: GX200 VS G10 VS G9 VS LX3 VX P6000

HKWHY

HKWHY
個人積分：1分
文章編號：9006016

1分

樓主

2008-11-15 6:58

各位有興趣的話，或者你或是猶豫不定，想比較一下這些猛獸的高iso能耐，可以來看一下：

高ISO比拼: GX200 VS G10 VS G9 VS LX3 VX P6000

HKWHY
http://ricoh-gx.blogspot.com/

2008-11-15 6:58 發佈

文章關鍵字高iso 比拼

HKWHY

HKWHY
個人積分：1分
文章編號：9152595

1分

樓主

2008-11-25 22:17

有興趣的話，可到這裏觀戰

：
http://ricoh-gx.blogspot.com/2008/11/nightshots-comparison-round-two-g1-vs.html
(中文說明：請在到達後，在文末按印有"中文"的圖示，等待原圖彈出後閱讀．)
－－－－－－－－－－－－－
下面是我對近數次對決帖的主旨說明（不好意思，沒時間翻譯了）

下面是小弟對拙blog數次比對帖的補充說明：
Finally, I have put together the nightshots of the same scene for comparison between G1, DP1 and other compacts including GX200, LX3 and G10.

As a keen user of GX200, I have arranged another two comparsions between the likes of GX200, namely, G10, LX3, P6000, and the more powerful DP1. The comparisons are not for the sake of naming the winner of the race among these compacts which some may consider arch-enemies to each other. If you have been reading T.O.P., you may relate better to what I mean: there was a time when Mike of T.O.P. replied like “I didn't kill your mother” to some readers who considered his adverse comments about a camera offensive.

(

夜景對決第一回Nightshots Comparison (Round 1): GX200 vs G10 vs G9 vs LX3 vs P6000:
http://ricoh-gx.blogspot.com/2008/11/nightshots-comparison-gx200-vs-g10-vs.html

廣角對比Wide Angle Comparison: GX200 vs G10 vs LX3 vs P6000:
http://ricoh-gx.blogspot.com/2008/11/your-market-research-here_04.html)

The comparisons which I put up serve to offer some reality performance checking of these cameras, which I think for general users is shooting in JPEGs and viewing them in normal size. From the comparisons, those of us interested in photography per se may hopefully pick one that suits his photography style and personal characters.

To that end, I also wrote some humble (and biased to some) insights in what to expect and ask upon reading a review. In short, the question to ask is: Do the strengths of the camera allow a me to achieve the results I need for most of the time? As far as that concerns, I have found that to some extent, the more obvious physical benefits like egronmics outweight some minor quality edges.

(

讀評測的竅門How to Read a Review:
http://ricoh-gx.blogspot.com/2008/11/lx3-vs-gx200-how-to-read-review.html

選購前先想想Stop and Think:
http://ricoh-gx.blogspot.com/2008/11/stop-and-think.html)

If you are like me who came from the SLR age and was used to the relatively unexpected results and denser grains in film photos, I think you would appreciate more that there are more in a good photo than a good camera, and good photos take much more than good cameras. From there, I stress on finding the right camera instead of the one with a better specs.

To me, the right one is GX200. Surely, I hope that it can have some of the nicer features. But, the most important of all, a closer-DSLR-like performance. So, the most recent comparison gives me some idea how much the GX200 has left to be desired and included in its future model.

HKWHY
http://ricoh-gx.blogspot.com/

banpui

banpui
個人積分：7分
文章編號：9157682

7分

3樓

2008-11-26 9:45

我只找到縮過的圖
有原圖嗎
--
上班偷看中

HKWHY

HKWHY
個人積分：1分
文章編號：9161973

1分

樓主

2008-11-26 14:19

banpui wrote:
我只找到縮過的圖有原...(恕刪)

上面的一段話說過："．．．．．．I think for general users is shooting in JPEGs and viewing them in normal size"（我認為一般用家拍的是JPEGs，看的圖的是正常大小）

所以，沒有，算是不鼓勵pixel-peeping吧．

HKWHY

HKWHY
個人積分：1分
文章編號：9199487

1分

樓主

2008-11-28 23:11

我在那邊發了帖，好奇的你可以去參考一下：
http://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=252&t=850333&last=9161973

HKWHY

HKWHY
個人積分：1分
文章編號：9200639

1分

樓主

2008-11-29 0:36

我在那邊發了帖，好奇的你可以去參考一下：
http://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=252&t=850333&last=9161973

respect

respect
個人積分：312分
文章編號：9201374

312分

7樓

2008-11-29 1:55

沒有測P6000嗎？難道P6000不好嗎？＝.＝

我愛台灣，我的國家敬請多支持台灣國產品

HKWHY

HKWHY
個人積分：1分
文章編號：9216433

1分

樓主

2008-11-30 18:12

respect wrote:
沒有測P6000嗎？...(恕刪)

可以怎樣說呢

......以後再試試看吧.