沒裝保護鏡.好像在裸奔?

ken902 wrote:
  老何大大也沒騙人(恕刪)

hkf07261980 wrote:
如果不幸飛來一顆小石頭，剛好朝著鏡頭飛過來，我寧願它打在便宜的MCUV上，也不希望它K到鏡頭前玉...
而是不是真的會有這種可能性?
自己思考囉，我不敢說沒有，也不想賭會不會有...
有，我的損失也就幾百塊...
沒有，我的損失也就幾百塊...

jjx874 wrote:
可能场景：小石头飞来(恕刪)

hkf07261980 wrote:
都有可能...您可以...(恕刪)

ken902 wrote:
首先j大應該是開玩笑(恕刪)

hkf07261980 wrote:
如果小石子飛來有辦法砸碎MCUV，導致碎片刮到前玉，那它在無MCUV保護下，您的鏡頭前玉會呈現何種狀況!?

For this test, I started out MUCH lower:

Promaster 62mm – Broke at a 5″ drop
Tiffen 52mm- Broke at a 5″ drop
Hoya 52mm – Broke at an 8″ drop
B+W 52mm – Broke at an 8″ drop
Canon 58mm – Broke at an 8″ drop
Nikon 52mm – Broke at a 13″ drop
Hoya 67mm – Broke at an 18″ drop

Lens Test Results:

No lens broke or was damaged in any way with the unweighted shuttle at any height. In order to get any lenses to break, we had to drop from the top with weight added. No filter tested could have survived even a 24-inch drop with no weight added.

Canon 35-70 Zoom – 48.5″ + 3/4lb combined weight
Sigma 75-300 AF Zoom (note this was after the drop test since the front element was still intact) 48.5″ + 3/4lb combined weight
Nikon 35-80 AF – 48.5″ + 1 full lb combined weight
Canon 50mm 1.8 – 48.5″ + 1 full lb combined weight
Vivitar 28-90 Series 1 – 48.5″ + 1 1/4 full lb combined weight
JCPenny 70-200 – (note this was after the drop test since the front element was still intact) 48.5″ + 1 1/4 full lb combined weight
Osawa 135 48.5″ + 3 full lb combined weight
Canon 70-200 Zoom 48.5″ + 4 full lb combined weight

jjx874 wrote:
可能毫发无伤安全帽首(恕刪)

hkf07261980 wrote:
最後一次回覆.............因為說實話，去爭辯這種不會有共識的內容，我實在沒那麼閒情逸致...

影片中的試驗是否就能代表所有廠商出的所有鏡頭!?
所有鏡頭碰到類似撞擊，對前玉是否都能絲毫無損，甚至連刮傷都沒有!?
如果能，那您是否敢用自己鏡頭去Try?
基本我就只講句實在話，我不會用我自己的鏡頭去賭，只因為這測試影片.............