有夠誇張的攝影師...

hao0915 wrote:
我們協會在台中辦了一...(恕刪)

Nana wrote:
得到肯定又如何
那高高在上看不起人的態度令人作嘔

「我已經很久沒秀照片了
只怕我一秀出來就讓您下不了台啊

對付您這種程度
我肯用技術資料跟您談已經算很禮遇您了
還不乖乖地多學點技術
談什麼藝術,您還不夠格呢!!!!」

完全不知謙讓為何物
你的照片是拍得不錯
但01上比你好的大有人在，還不到那樣高吧
做藝術的做到你這樣真是在火入魔了

williamhorsom wrote:
實在看不下去~糾正一
糾正一下powerslide誤導入門者的謬誤~
看色階圖是參考依據~不是絕對~
它是用來判斷一張照片的階調在什麼位置有多少的色素在其中罷了!
從業十多年來,階調的分佈會依拍攝環境條件而有所不同~
如果一昧的要求準確分佈反而是種"病態"~
色階表的功能是在紀錄0~255階中,相機所記錄的RGB光量的多寡,所以在photo中,分別為RGB及R,G,B四種不同的色譜!
如果照powerslide大師的說法,會有很大的誤導~


最後,我還是強調,色階圖沒在看什麼DR值的~真是誤導~我們是在拍照,從事影像創作,更不是做數學題~拜託!!

...(恕刪)

powerslide wrote:

麻煩您,把以下紅色標示的文字看清楚再來斬釘截鐵地說色階圖沒在看什麼DR的

(你以為gamma值是幹什麼用的)


"Dynamic Range and Bit-Depth

Converting a high-quality scan into an 8-bit linear (gamma=1.0) space value would truncatethe dynamic range, since it is physically impossible to store more than DMax 2.4 in an 8-bit integer. However after using gamma encoding it is theoretically possible to store a dynamic range of (log(255^2.2))=5.30. In reality the "sparse" data in the lower extreme of
any 8-bit non-linear (gamma encoded) space considerably limits it's useful range.








This histogram shows an almost perfect distribution of tones covering about a 4 stop dynamic range — from deep shadows on the left to just short of bright highlights on the right. This fits comfortably within the approximately 5 stop dynamic range capability of most digital imaging chips.

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/understanding-series/understanding-histograms.shtml

http://www.ronbigelow.com/articles/camera-histogram/camera-histogram.htm

What Histogram shows

Histogram can tell you many things about the image, about the processing already done on the image and also about the device (digital camera, scanner ...etc). First look at the x axis. This represent the dynamic range 0-255 (dark-light). The wider is the histogram , the better is the dynamic range and that means also image with better contrast.

Dull Image	Narrow histogram - small dynamic range means low contrast and flat image
Normal Image	Wide histogram, great dynamic range means also good contrast

williamhorsom wrote:


powerslide大師~真是名符其實的硬體狂~到底是拍照還是算數的啊~要比劍,就亮出你的作品給大家瞧瞧~拿黑時期的階調曲線出來論述~會不會洗黑白啊!!
看國外數據,數學公式,重點是你到底拍了些什麼東東,指正別人的謬誤,請用眾人看得懂的論述方式~~得獎又怎樣~不會做人,來商界比比~看你怎麼活!!
藝術本無罪,就你這種人不進步~枉害後進不知路~~前輩不是這樣搞的,你知要眾人服,人不服你枉為師,學著點!!

williamhorsom wrote:
哈~終於有圖了~
來來來~~大伙別客氣,評一下大師的"藝術創作"吧!!!

frankhc wrote:
感覺powerslide大師是01霹靂火看多了, 講話咄咄逼人, 語氣尖酸刻薄, 招招致人於死, 莫非跟樓主十冤九仇, 父仇不共戴天? 這種方式的發言真是讓01版越來越烏煙障氣, 看來大家都得回小學重修有品運動了.

williamhorsom wrote:

powerslide大師~真是名符其實的硬體狂~到底是拍照還是算數的啊~要比劍,就亮出你的作品給大家瞧瞧~拿黑時期的階調曲線出來論述~會不會洗黑白啊!!
看國外數據,數學公式,重點是你到底拍了些什麼東東,指正別人的謬誤,請用眾人看得懂的論述方式~~得獎又怎樣~不會做人,來商界比比~看你怎麼活!!
藝術本無罪,就你這種人不進步~枉害後進不知路~~前輩不是這樣搞的,你知要眾人服,人不服你枉為師,學著點!!

.

williamhorsom wrote:
哈~終於有圖了~
來來來~~大伙別客氣,評一下大師的"藝術創作"吧!!!

williamhorsom wrote:
來囉~讓大師久等了~我是以拍商攝為主,人像則純屬為朋友及個人創作,我沒有什麼到國外的照片,貼的都是台灣地區的照片,我想強調一點,無論在什麼地方獲得肯定,該有風範,還是要有~停止無意義的攻訐吧!

williamhorsom wrote:

powerslide大師~真是名符其實的硬體狂~到底是拍照還是算數的啊~要比劍,就亮出你的作品給大家瞧瞧~拿黑時期的階調曲線出來論述~會不會洗黑白啊!!
看國外數據,數學公式,重點是你到底拍了些什麼東東,指正別人的謬誤,請用眾人看得懂的論述方式~~得獎又怎樣~不會做人,來商界比比~看你怎麼活!!
藝術本無罪,就你這種人不進步~枉害後進不知路~~前輩不是這樣搞的,你知要眾人服,人不服你枉為師,學著點!!

williamhorsom wrote:
哈~終於有圖了~
來來來~~大伙別客氣,評一下大師的"藝術創作"吧!!!

frankhfw wrote:
說實話，我不懂藝術。...(恕刪)

Nana wrote:
得到肯定又如何那高高...(恕刪)