• 11

這才是正宗的微軟平板

8JG wrote:
太棒了價格你...(恕刪)

果然是教徒 自知理虧就在那聲東擊西 我指正你的都是fact跟valid points 你要跟我扯一些其他亂七八糟的廢話就隨你囉;) 我管市佔如何 我就是會買我認為的好動東西 不管是哪一家蘋果出的也好微軟出的也好 但是不會像某些人那麼盲目只追隨一家公司
你自己看看您的留言內出現多少跳針跟錯誤的地方吧,祝你的邏輯早一點能開竅
PS. IPad 3000多?你用的是五手機嗎?
joe0912 wrote:
果然是教徒 自知理虧...(恕刪)


Android pad 3000多就有了
就算新的asus google pad199美元也將上市
Ipad2新的12500

這和教徒有什麼關係
我只是等不及,希望微軟快點公佈價格,快點上市
最好微軟牌win 8 手機也上一上

然後吃鱉
二手ipad3g版本一代又便宜又可以改裝jb變iPhone 3G 16g超便宜的
確實是好物
因為沒說是哪家3g系統,所以有人猜可能只有wifi...那是非常非常不妙的事情。

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/Microsoft-Surface-WiFi-only-3G-4G-windows-8-tablet,16106.html

Report: Microsoft Surface Tablets to Be Wi-Fi-only at First
3:00 PM - June 23, 2012 by Jane McEntegart - source: Bloomberg

Microsoft's Surface tablets will initially only have Wi-Fi connectivity when they launch later this year.

ZoomWhen Microsoft announced its Surface tablets earlier this week, it kept quiet about the finer details of these tablets. Sure, we know that the Windows RT model will run on an ARM processor and the Pro version will pack Intel's Core i series of processors, but Microsoft didn't reveal important details such as RAM or connectivity (or pricing, for that matter).

Today, the rumor mill is churning out reports that the Surface tablets will be Wi-Fi only when they launch. Bloomberg cites two people familiar with the matter who say Microsoft's iPad rival will launch without 3G or 4G LTE connectivity. The news outlet goes on to cite one analyst who says this might present an issue for marketing, as Microsoft on Monday touted the device as an ultra-mobile device suitable for working on the go.

Marketing efforts aside, Microsoft is aiming for business professionals with the Surface Pro, and business people might take issue with the fact that using the device on the go will rely on having a Wi-Fi network close by. Those with devices like the iPad or the Galaxy Tab might not mind Wi-Fi-only (indeed, the lack of a data contract is a plus for many), but Microsoft's Surface, with its high-end specs, a full version of Windows, and Microsoft Office, is designed less for the casual user and more for the constantly-moving professional.

The important thing to note here is that Bloomberg's sources say the Surface will initially go on sale without data connectivity. Whether this means one or both models will ship without it, or that Microsoft plans to release 3G models not too long after the initial launch, remains to be seen. However, what is clear is that Microsoft apparently does have intentions for a 3G version, so it won't be missing in the 3G tablet market for long.
I support the domestic film industry,but who would support me?(Google翻的)
沒3g微軟也不care反正不行就砍
白老鼠很多
8JG wrote:
沒3g微軟也不car...(恕刪)

其實沒3g也很好!而且這樣pad也會比較省電些,有3g的相對更耗電!
我都是用wifi版的pad,
都是用我的手機galaxy note 5.3開基地台分享的,
以前沒這樣用過覺得手機開基地台耗電而不實用,
後來體驗後覺得很不錯,速度夠快!且也沒想像中耗電,可連續使用8個小時左右,
如果開著基地台沒在分享傳輸的話,也不會耗電到哪,
所以現在都是這樣使用的,也不用再多辦一張3g網卡,
感覺微軟是在幫我們省錢的,很貼心 ^^

yukimichael wrote:
其實沒3g也很好!而...(恕刪)


記得喔
要買win 8 rt版本
現在的電腦使用者都越來越趨向理性消費,教徒式的行銷手法遲早得面對現實
最後大家心裡會問一個問題,憑甚麼功能差不多的東西我要花比較多的錢去買?只為了買他那個logo?
sony的vios不已經是前車之鑑了嗎?
蘋果確實為大家開拓了一條新的道路,但這條路也不是蘋果最早發現的,只是蘋果得到了天時地利人和才能成功罷了
以後就是八仙過海看誰的本事比較高了
香港首富李嘉誠說過:當一個新生事物出現,只有5%的人知道時趕緊做,這就是機會,做早就是先機;當有50%的人知道時,你做個消費者就行了;當超過50%時,你看都不用去看了。
現在的手機和平板早就進入戰國時代了,殺到見骨是遲早的事,蘋果要真的有那麼神就不用猛打法律戰了

yukimichael wrote:
其實沒3g也很好!而...(恕刪)


我用一代ipad分享ap出來超耐用的
自從用了4s 分享給其他裝置,沒幾個小時就沒電

不過出門我必戴ipad
三星那台就顯的太大台
cazando wrote:
,只是蘋果得到了天時地利人和才能成功罷了
以後就是八仙過海看誰的本事比較高了...(恕刪)


只要去翻翻當時ipad1發售前夕 就會知道根本沒有什麼天時地利人和可言

甚至發表當下被當時媒體說成毫無新意可言

.......

taros78 wrote:
只要去翻翻當時ipad1發售前夕 就會知道根本沒有什麼天時地利人和可言

這點我有點印象,很多人批評只是放大版的iPhone而已。
很多人不看好iPAD,
且之前iPAD市佔率與出貨量跟iPhone完全是不能比
  • 11
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 11)
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?