• 5

【CES】 Nokia 閉關展示的Qt技術

N7Nate wrote:
我覺得現在情勢就像
Samsung Andoird-BABA和Nokia WP7-Meego一樣
BADA和Meego都是Samsung/Nokia寄予厚望的自家作業系統平台
但迫於現實面必須先採用別人的高階作業系統來維繫營運
不但目前產業最肥的軟體獲益吃不到,軟體發展也會受限於他人
從Elop過去的言行看來Meego的未來並沒有被鎖死
As I said before, software development is major weakness of Nokia, just look at how many years they spend on Symbian and Meego but still cannot comes up satisfactory platform for the public. This is especially true when you compare the laid back European engineer at Nokia with MS/Apple/Google.

Nokia already let go the head of Meego, and they already said Meego is a "project" instead of "platform". Every company have limited resource, and I don't think Nokia would put any effort in Meego.

For QT, it's good it's support many platforms but is it sounds similar to Java (which claims platform independent but never conquer the world)?? In the end, developers only care which IDE brings the most $$$. That's why MS visual studio take over the desktop while Apple is the major one on the mobile.
My SE X1 rom-> http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=471
jackleung wrote:
Nokia already let go the head of Meego, and they already said Meego is a "project" instead of "platform"

我對軟體開發工程射獵沒這麼多
是一直知道Nokia將Meego以Project形式來進行
不過之前看Elop給員工的信
以為Elop會以Meego當作基礎Platform開發出自己的生態系(這種規模的Project... 顯然我之前想的跟你所說的規模有些落差)
採用Windows Phone應該只是個權宜之計

所以說Nokia強調這是Project
即意味著Meego在Nokia陣營中已被視為跟Java一樣是個強大但賺不到$$的技術?

這句「視為跟Java一樣是個強大但賺不到$$的技術?」應驗了

Qt 4 主要是由Trolltech 和 Nokia 閉關開發的,只是將其結果公布在開發者社區。
Qt 5 將轉為開源開發平台,並跨平台Linux上的X11/Wayland, Windows,以及 Mac;其他平台NOKIA需視為後期支源的平台。
  • 5
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?