• 7

MikroTik RouterBoard(RouterOS) RB750自動重開

豬波 wrote:
通常遇到自動重開機,...(恕刪)



我的RB450G買來還沒開機就直接把那兩顆Su'Scon電容換成OSCON SC 620uf/6.3V了,ripple current至少有4.5A吧。 這邊的漏電流無所謂,不會有影響。

phuang3 wrote:
我的RB450G買來...(恕刪)


大大太強了吧
可以貼張照片來看看

如果有教學那會更好~~~期待中
請問你們防火牆的設定?禁止外PING,關必不必要服務,內網攻擊的設定該如何防範?

xyzcomtw wrote:
請問你們防火牆的設定...(恕刪)


內網我是直接設定 pppoe 撥接, 所以應該沒這問題
ex:假冒 arp

其他的要看看有沒有其他高手提供
換完電容後,我的RB750到現在log是沒看到reboot了
phuang3 wrote:
我的RB450G買來...(恕刪)

orc wrote:
換完電容後,我的RB...(恕刪)


有人可以分享一下如何換電容嗎?

scubadiving wrote:
有人可以分享一下如何...(恕刪)



這其實很簡單,把基板那兩顆Su'con的電解電容解焊,換掉即可。

scubadiving wrote:
一下子跳這麼多號~~...

*) metarouter - fixed problem where local routeros instances did not boot;

(恕刪)



RB450G 搭配 ROS v5.18, 建立一個MetaRouter,
這個創立的MetaRouter會一直停在booting狀態..

用舊版的ROS v5.14反而不會有MetaRouter停在booting狀態的bug.

查官網論壇,RB450G搭配MetaRouter 一直有bug未解.





scubadiving wrote:
有人可以分享一下如何...(恕刪)


用焊槍解焊舊電容, 再把新電容焊上去..
15151515
手賤更新到最新版,結果跑個幾天就kernel failure,跑去看官方討論區有什麼解決之道,結果那邊的人罵得很兇,像是MikroTik的*stable*是拿來讓使用者當白老鼠的..

jandafields=>
Do you remember several years ago when their products and software were simply STABLE? The v2 mikrotik software was awesome! Back then, there was lots of talk of "this will kill cisco, etc". Now, it seems that there is something major wrong in every single release, that has to be fixed in the next release... which then introduces yet another problem.

I've got some very old Mikrotik v2 stuff running 24/7 that hasn't been touched in years... and still going strong... uptime in the hundreds (or thousands) of days.

Now days, with their new software and hardware, there is always something wrong. The RB2011ahx2 limited storage, the RB1100 crashing, the RB751 wireless performance, the RB951 wireless disappearing, OVPN problems, SSTP stability issues......

--------------------
WirelessRudy=>
Can't agree more on that!

What struck me lately in the last upgrades is that nowadays it seems any update is immediately called "stable" where within weeks the successor upgrade is there because it was not so stable after all....

In the v3.x and v4.x families the stable versions where always some versions behind the latest upgrades.... (not that that makes a lot of sense, being "stable" and been succeeded by upgrades is sometimes a bit of a contradiction...)

I think new upgrades should only be called "stable" if they run stable on the majority of hardware-software configurations for at least some weeks without any serious issues being mentioned by an relevant group of regular forum users (these can be considered as 'alfa'(?), ''beta'(?), no better, "charlie" testers

I fully agree with you that an mayor router as the rb1100, which will be used by many for the network traffic management, in lots of cases in transparent mode, is now not able to run a software version that is published on the download page as "stable". Ridiculous!

5.16, 5,17 and now 5.18 are succeeded in a fast schedule which in my opinion shows not a lot of serious testing is done before release.

I can't yet pass to 5.17 or higher because I have several wireless units starting to disconnect with these version and MT, yet again, don't seem to be able to put their finger on what is happening here but instead just bring new version out without solving the problems existing in older ones...
  • 7
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 7)
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?